Soru

Zorluk: OrtaEstablishing Priorities

The triage nurse in a busy adult emergency department is concurrently evaluating four walk-in clients. Based on the principles of prioritization and triage, arrange the clients in the order they must be medically evaluated, from highest priority (first) to lowest priority (last).

  1. 1A 28-year-old client presenting with facial swelling, audible stridor, and drooling after eating a peanut cookie.
  2. 2A 62-year-old client who reports a sudden onset of large-volume, dark red rectal bleeding and has a heart rate of 118 bpm.
  3. 3A 35-year-old client experiencing right lower quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, and a temperature of 100.2°F (37.9°C).
  4. 4A 70-year-old client with a history of heart failure who has 2+ bilateral pedal edema and is requesting a medication refill.

Cevap

The correct sequence is to first see the client with stridor and drooling, followed by the client with rectal bleeding and tachycardia, then the client with right lower quadrant pain, and finally the client with chronic pedal edema requesting a refill.
Effective prioritization in nursing requires a systematic approach, typically starting with the ABCs (Airway, Breathing, Circulation), followed by Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, and distinguishing between acute (unexpected) and chronic (expected) problems. The client with stridor has a closing airway, making them the absolute highest priority. The client with rectal bleeding and tachycardia is experiencing circulatory compromise, making them second. The client with acute abdominal pain is stable but requires timely diagnosis, placing them third. The client with chronic pedal edema has expected findings for their diagnosis and is seeking routine care, making them the lowest priority.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify any clients with immediate threats to Airway, Breathing, or Circulation.
The 28-year-old has stridor and drooling, indicating a severe airway obstruction (anaphylaxis). This client is Priority 1.
Without an open airway, breathing and circulation interventions will fail.
2
Evaluate the remaining clients for acute circulatory compromise or severe physiological instability.
The 62-year-old has large-volume rectal bleeding and a heart rate of 118 bpm, indicating active bleeding and compensatory tachycardia. This client is Priority 2.
Active hemorrhage poses an immediate threat to life through hypovolemic shock, falling under 'Circulation' in the ABC framework.
3
Differentiate between acute illnesses and chronic/expected findings among the remaining clients.
The 35-year-old has acute abdominal pain suggestive of appendicitis, while the 70-year-old has expected, chronic pedal edema from established heart failure.
Acute, sudden-onset conditions have higher triage acuity than chronic, long-standing alterations.
4
Sequence the final two clients based on acuity.
The 35-year-old client with appendicitis symptoms is Priority 3. The 70-year-old client seeking a medication refill is Priority 4.
The client with an acute surgical abdomen requires timely evaluation to prevent complications like rupture, whereas the stable chronic client can safely wait.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Priorities using the ABCs and Acute vs. Chronic Frameworks
Bu soruyu puanla