An administrator needs to restrict access to a sensitive custom field, Credit_Limit__c, on the Account object so that standard users cannot view or edit it across reports, list views, or the API. Additionally, one specific compliance auditor who holds a standard user profile requires Read-only access to this field.
Which TWO actions should the administrator take to meet these security requirements? (Choose 2 answers)
- Modify Field-Level Security (FLS) to remove Read and Edit access on Credit_Limit__c for the standard user profile.Cevap
- Create a Permission Set that grants Read access to Credit_Limit__c and assign it to the compliance auditor.Cevap
- CUse Dynamic Forms component visibility rules to hide Credit_Limit__c from the Lightning record page for unauthorized users.
- DCreate a new custom profile with Read access to Credit_Limit__c and assign it to the compliance auditor.
Cevap
The administrator should modify Field-Level Security on the standard profile to restrict access broadly, and assign a Permission Set granting Read access specifically to the compliance auditor.
The correct solution uses Field-Level Security (FLS) to remove access to the sensitive field on the baseline profile and leverages a Permission Set to grant Read access strictly to the single user needing exception access. FLS guarantees complete security across UI, reports, and API, while Permission Sets allow granular access expansion without multiplying custom profiles.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Profiles establish baseline restrictive access (including FLS), while Permission Sets provide additive permissions for specific users.