While researching historical shell-based currencies, a student took the following notes:
* Cowrie shells were used as a natural, durable currency across Africa and Asia.
* Cowrie shells are lightweight and difficult to counterfeit.
* Wampum consists of carved, tubular beads made from clam shells.
* Indigenous nations of North America used wampum for ceremonial gifts and currency.
* Making wampum beads required skilled labor to shape and string them together.
The student wants to contrast the geographic regions where cowrie shells and wampum were used and the physical form of each currency. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
- While cowrie shells were natural shells utilized as currency across Africa and Asia, wampum consisted of carved beads used in North America.Cevap
- BBoth cowrie shells and wampum were durable, shell-based mediums of exchange used in historical societies.
- CCowrie shells were highly valued as currency in Africa and Asia because they were lightweight and difficult to counterfeit.
- DAlthough wampum and cowrie shells were both used as currency in Africa and Asia, wampum was distinguished by being carved rather than natural.
Cevap
While cowrie shells were natural shells utilized as currency across Africa and Asia, wampum consisted of carved beads used in North America.
The correct answer successfully fulfills the student's rhetorical goal by contrasting the geographic regions of the currencies (Africa and Asia for cowrie shells versus North America for wampum) and their physical forms (natural shells versus carved beads) in a single, grammatically complete sentence.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Rhetorical Synthesis: Comparison and Contrast
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s