Text 1 For decades, archaeologists assumed that the transition from foraging to agricultur… — SAT

Text 1
For decades, archaeologists assumed that the transition from foraging to agriculture in the Fertile Crescent was driven by a sudden, severe drought around 11,000 years ago. According to this "oasis model," climate-driven food scarcity forced human populations to cluster near dwindling water sources and domesticate wild grains to avoid starvation, making environmental stress the primary catalyst for the Neolithic Revolution.

Text 2
Recent archaeological and paleoclimatic evidence suggests that the initial onset of plant cultivation actually coincided with a prolonged period of climatic stability and resource abundance. Rather than acting out of desperation, early communities likely experimented with sowing wild cereals because reliable rainfall and plentiful local flora provided the long-term food security necessary to sustain sedentary lifestyles and support agricultural innovation over generations.

Based on the passages, how would the author of Text 2 most likely characterize the "oasis model" described in Text 1?

As an explanation that relies on a premise about climate-driven scarcity that is challenged by recent findingsCevap
B
As a theory that correctly identifies the role of resource abundance but misinterprets the geographical location of the transition
C
As a valid framework that explains why early communities avoided cultivating wild cereals
D
As a model that underestimates the level of environmental stress experienced by early foragers

Cevap

The author of Text 2 would characterize the "oasis model" as an explanation that relies on a premise about climate-driven scarcity that is challenged by recent findings.

The correct answer states that the author of Text 2 would characterize the "oasis model" as an explanation that relies on a premise about climate-driven scarcity that is challenged by recent findings. This is correct because Text 1 describes the "oasis model" as relying on the idea that climate-driven food scarcity and severe drought forced people to adopt agriculture. Text 2 opposes this by presenting recent evidence showing that agriculture began during a period of climatic stability and resource abundance, thereby directly challenging the scarcity-based premise of the model.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Identify the core premise of the "oasis model" from Text 1.

The model proposes that agriculture was driven by a sudden, severe drought and climate-driven food scarcity.

Understanding the premise of the theory in Text 1 is necessary to determine how the author of Text 2 would respond to it.

Analyze the main argument and evidence in Text 2 regarding environmental conditions.

Text 2 argues that agriculture began during a period of climatic stability and resource abundance, not drought or food scarcity.

This allows comparison between the environmental assumptions of the model in Text 1 and the new evidence presented in Text 2.

Synthesize the relationship between the two perspectives.

Because Text 2's evidence of stability and abundance directly contradicts Text 1's premise of drought and scarcity, the author of Text 2 would view the oasis model's core premise as incorrect or challenged.

This yields the correct relational synthesis to match the correct option.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis

Tahmini Süre:1m 30s

Soru

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Konular

Bu konudan daha fazla soru