Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorCentral Ideas

In eighteenth-century Europe, the collaborative nature of astronomical observation often clashed with the gendered institutional frameworks of scientific academies. When analyzing the extensive star catalogs produced by Caroline Herschel, contemporary commentators frequently characterized her contributions as 'painstaking transcription'—a categorization that framed her labor as purely mechanical and secondary to the theoretical synthesis performed by her brother, William. However, historian of science Londa Schiebinger argues that this characterization was not merely a passive reflection of prevailing social prejudices, but a deliberate rhetorical strategy employed by academic gatekeepers. By defining Herschel's astronomical labor as clerical rather than intellectual, the scientific establishment could exploit her precise observational data to validate their own cosmological models while simultaneously justifying the formal exclusion of women from institutional membership.

Which choice best states the main idea of the text?

  1. A
    Eighteenth-century European scientific academies actively opposed collaborative research models because they undermined traditional individual achievements in astronomy.
  2. B
    Although Caroline Herschel's star catalogs were highly precise, her work was ultimately excluded from the theoretical models developed by her brother, William.
  3. The classification of Caroline Herschel’s astronomical labor as mechanical rather than intellectual was a deliberate strategy used by the scientific establishment to benefit from her observations while maintaining gender-based exclusion.Cevap
  4. D
    Caroline Herschel's primary motivation in compiling her star catalogs was to challenge the institutional boundaries of scientific academies and secure formal memberships for women.

Cevap

The classification of Caroline Herschel’s astronomical labor as mechanical rather than intellectual was a deliberate strategy used by the scientific establishment to benefit from her observations while maintaining gender-based exclusion.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the passage's main argument: that the characterization of Caroline Herschel's contributions as clerical rather than intellectual was a deliberate rhetorical strategy used by the scientific establishment to exploit her data while justifying the continued exclusion of women from their institutions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Read the passage to identify the central subject and context.
The passage discusses how Caroline Herschel's astronomical work was historically classified as mechanical transcription rather than intellectual labor.
Establishing the topic and how it is framed is the first step in understanding the text's central focus.
2
Analyze the shift in argument introduced by Londa Schiebinger.
Schiebinger argues that this mechanical classification was not passive bias but a deliberate rhetorical strategy by academic gatekeepers.
Identifying the author's primary counter-argument or thesis is essential for isolating the central idea of an academic passage.
3
Determine the functional purpose of this rhetorical strategy.
The final sentence reveals the double purpose: to exploit Herschel's data for validation while justifying the formal exclusion of women.
Connecting the strategy to its institutional utility captures the full scope of the passage's conclusion.
4
Evaluate the choices to locate the one that represents this synthesis.
The statement summarizing the classification as a deliberate strategy to exploit observations while maintaining gender-based exclusion is correct.
This choice accurately maps to all elements of the passage's main argument without introducing outside assumptions or over-generalizations.

Anahtar Kavram

Central Ideas
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Central Ideas

Bu konudan daha fazla soru