Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayCross-Text Connections: Perspective Comparison

Text 1
In a recent study, environmental psychologist Dr. Laura Vance argues that introducing live plants into corporate office spaces significantly enhances employee productivity. Vance and her team monitored workers over a six-month period, observing that employees in offices decorated with various indoor plants completed routine data-entry tasks 12% faster than those working in sparse, plant-free environments. Vance attributes this performance boost to the plants' documented ability to lower physiological stress levels and improve indoor air quality. She concludes that modern office designs must prioritize the integration of natural elements, such as vegetation, to maximize daily work output.

Text 2
Cognitive psychologist Dr. Marcus Thorne later reviewed the findings from Dr. Vance's study and conducted a follow-up analysis of the same corporate office spaces. Thorne suggests that the productivity increase observed by Vance was not directly caused by the presence of the plants. Instead, he highlights that the installation of the plants coincided with a comprehensive office renovation, which also introduced updated LED lighting and adjustable ergonomic chairs. Thorne argues that these broader workplace upgrades, rather than the addition of flora, were the primary drivers of the employees' increased task completion speed.

Based on the texts, how would Dr. Thorne (the author of Text 2) most likely view the conclusion presented in Text 1?

  1. As an overestimation of the plants' impact that overlooks the influence of other concurrent physical upgrades in the workspaceCevap
  2. B
    As a well-supported claim that accurately identifies the relationship between plant presence and employee stress reduction
  3. C
    As a finding that is invalid because employees working in plant-free environments are actually more productive than those in decorated spaces
  4. D
    As a flawed conclusion because the data-entry tasks monitored during the study were too simple to represent actual office productivity

Cevap

As an overestimation of the plants' impact that overlooks the influence of other concurrent physical upgrades in the workspace
The correct answer is correct because Dr. Thorne (the author of Text 2) asserts that the productivity boost observed by Dr. Vance was not caused by the plants themselves. Instead, Thorne points out that the introduction of plants coincided with a broader office renovation that included new LED lighting and ergonomic chairs, making the conclusion in Text 1 an overestimation of the plants' impact that ignores these concurrent improvements.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main argument in Text 1 regarding office plants and productivity.
Text 1 concludes that integrating plants into office spaces directly increases worker productivity.
This establishes the perspective that Text 2 will respond to.
2
Identify Dr. Thorne's counterargument in Text 2.
Text 2 argues that other factors (new LED lighting and ergonomic chairs) introduced during the same office renovation were the real cause of the productivity increase, not the plants.
This shows how the author of Text 2 interprets the findings of Text 1.
3
Select the option that matches Dr. Thorne's characterization of the Text 1 conclusion.
The option stating that Text 1 overestimates the plants' impact by overlooking concurrent workspace upgrades matches Dr. Thorne's argument.
This directly answers the prompt.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Text Connections: Perspective Comparison
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Cross-Text Connections: Perspective Comparison

Bu konudan daha fazla soru