In evolutionary biology, the "expensive tissue hypothesis" posits that the expansion of the hominin brain was metabolically offset by a compensatory reduction in the size of the digestive tract. Conversely, evolutionary anthropologist Dr. Alissa Chen proposes that brain expansion was primarily enabled by a behavioral transition to high-quality, energy-dense diets—such as meat and tubers—which provided the requisite caloric surplus without necessitating any anatomical reduction in gut volume. To test this hypothesis, Chen's team analyzed fossilized skeletal remains of various Pleistocene hominin species, evaluating both dental microwear complexity (where high complexity indicates the consumption of hard, brittle, or tough high-quality foods) and ribcage morphology (used to reconstruct relative gastrointestinal capacity).
Which finding, if true, would most directly support Chen's hypothesis?
- AHominin species that showed the greatest reduction in digestive tract size, as indicated by narrow ribcages, also showed the most significant increases in cranial capacity, irrespective of their dental microwear complexity.
- BFossils of hominin species with low dental microwear complexity showed a corresponding reduction in cranial capacity and a widening of the ribcage, indicating that low-quality diets directly prevented brain expansion.
- Hominin species that exhibited the most rapid increases in cranial capacity also displayed high dental microwear complexity, while their reconstructed ribcage dimensions indicated that gastrointestinal capacity remained constant or expanded.Cevap
- DEarly hominins with large gastrointestinal capacities were able to migrate to diverse new environments because their dental microwear permitted the consumption of highly abrasive fallback foods when high-energy resources were scarce.