An individual trader enters a sequence of non-bona fide limit orders for a thinly traded equity security to create a false appearance of market depth, intending to cancel them prior to execution once the stock price moves favorably. Simultaneously, the trader executes offsetting buy and sell orders for the same security across accounts with identical beneficial ownership to create artificial volume. Which of the following statements regarding these activities are correct?
- Entering non-bona fide orders intended to manipulate market prices and create a false impression of trading interest constitutes illegal spoofing.Cevap
- Executing trades with no change in beneficial ownership to generate misleading trading activity constitutes prohibited wash trading.Cevap
- CExecuting matched buy and sell orders across accounts under common ownership is permissible as long as the trades are executed on a registered exchange.
- DBecause FINRA is a self-regulatory organization rather than a federal agency, it lacks the legal jurisdiction to discipline member firms or associated persons for market manipulation.
Cevap
Entering non-bona fide orders to manipulate prices constitutes illegal spoofing, and executing transactions with no change in beneficial ownership constitutes prohibited wash trading.
The scenario describes two distinct prohibited market practices: entering non-bona fide orders to deceive other market participants (spoofing) and executing offsetting transactions without changing beneficial ownership to create fake volume (wash trading). Both activities violate federal securities laws and FINRA rules.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Market Manipulation Tactics and SRO Enforcement Scope
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s