An executive assistant at a publicly traded logistics company discovers confidential flight arrangements and meeting notes on a shared printer indicating that the firm is acquiring a smaller competitor at a premium. The assistant tells their brother about the upcoming acquisition, but neither the assistant nor the brother purchases any shares. Two days later, the brother tells a colleague at work, who subsequently buys 500 shares prior to the public announcement. Under federal insider trading regulations, which of the following statements regarding liability is correct?
- The executive assistant and their brother can both be held liable as tippers even though neither executed a trade.Cevap
- BThe colleague who traded is exempt from tippee liability because they had no direct employment relationship with the logistics company.
- CLiability is limited solely to the colleague who executed the trade because no insider trading violation occurs without an actual trade by the tipper.
- DNeither the assistant nor the brother incurred any regulatory liability because the information was obtained from a shared printer accessible to multiple employees.
Cevap
The executive assistant and their brother can both be held liable as tippers even though neither executed a trade.
Under federal insider trading regulations, passing material nonpublic information (tipping) constitutes a securities violation if a downstream recipient trades on that information. The tippers do not need to place trades or profit directly to be held liable for insider trading violations.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Regulations