A corporate paralegal working at a law firm assisting with a confidential corporate merger mentions details of the pending acquisition to a relative. The relative shares the information with a close friend, who then purchases shares of the target company prior to the public announcement. Which of the following statements regarding insider trading liability under federal securities laws are correct?
- The paralegal can be held liable as a tipper even if the paralegal did not personally buy or sell any shares of the target company.Cevap
- The friend who executed the stock purchase can be held liable as a tippee even though they are not an employee or insider of either corporation.Cevap
- CA tippee is completely exempt from insider trading violations if the transaction took place on a public exchange at prevailing market prices.
- DTipper liability applies only if the tipper received a direct cash payment from the individual who ultimately traded the shares.
Cevap
Under federal securities laws, both the statement that the paralegal can be held liable as a tipper without personally trading and the statement that the friend can be held liable as a tippee despite not being a corporate insider are correct.
Tipper liability applies to anyone who breaches a duty by disclosing material nonpublic information, regardless of whether that individual executes a trade. Similarly, tippee liability applies to individuals who trade while knowing the information was confidential and wrongfully passed along, even if they have no employment connection to the underlying corporation.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Elements of Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Rules