A guest attending a private gathering overhears a corporate executive disclose unannounced material nonpublic details regarding an upcoming cash tender offer for a competing firm. The executive disclosed the information intentionally to impress attendees. The guest, who has no employment relationship with either corporation, immediately purchases shares of the target company prior to the public announcement and sells them for a substantial profit. Under federal securities laws, which of the following statements correctly evaluates the legal liability of the guest who executed the trade?
- The guest can be held liable as a tippee for insider trading because the trade was executed using material nonpublic information derived from an insider's breach of duty.Cevap
- BThe guest is exempt from insider trading liability because tippee provisions apply strictly to officers, directors, or employees of the issuer.
- CThe guest is exempt from liability because disclosing information in a social setting automatically renders the nonpublic information public domain.
- DThe guest is exempt from liability because legal responsibility under insider trading rules rests entirely on the tipper who disclosed the information, not the party executing the trade.
Cevap
The guest can be held liable as a tippee for insider trading because the trade was executed using material nonpublic information derived from an insider's breach of duty.
Under the Insider Trading Sanctions Act and Rule 10b-5 principles, a tippee assumes a fiduciary duty not to trade on material nonpublic information when the tippee knows or should know that the tipper breached a duty by communicating the information. Employment status with the target or acquiring firm is not required for liability to attach.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Rules
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s