During a period of declining share prices, a proprietary trading firm simultaneously executes buy and sell orders for the exact same security across two separate accounts under common ownership. The transactions involve identical prices and quantities, resulting in no actual change in beneficial ownership, but creating a misleading appearance of active trading volume to attract retail investors. How is this trading activity classified under federal securities laws, and which entity holds the authority to criminally prosecute individuals engaging in this behavior?
- It is classified as wash trading, and criminal prosecution authority rests with the U.S. Department of Justice rather than self-regulatory organizations.Cevap
- BIt is classified as spoofing, and FINRA holds statutory authority to file criminal charges against the firm.
- CIt is classified as wash trading, and FINRA holds statutory authority to file criminal charges against the firm.
- DIt is classified as legitimate principal market making, provided the broker-dealer acts as a principal rather than an agent during execution.
Cevap
The activity is classified as wash trading, and criminal prosecution authority rests with the U.S. Department of Justice rather than self-regulatory organizations.
Executing offsetting orders under common ownership that yield no change in beneficial ownership is defined as wash trading, a manipulative practice prohibited under federal securities laws. Furthermore, self-regulatory organizations (SROs) such as FINRA possess civil enforcement jurisdiction over member firms but do not have statutory criminal prosecution authority; criminal charges must be brought by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Wash Trading and Regulatory Enforcement Authority