A compliance surveillance report at a broker-dealer flags two distinct trading patterns executed by institutional traders:
1. Trader X repeatedly enters non-bona fide large sell orders above the current offer without intending to execute them, cancelling them immediately after smaller buy orders execute on an opposing venue.
2. Trader Y conducts simultaneous buy and sell transactions in a thinly traded equity across two separate accounts held under identical beneficial ownership, resulting in high reported volume with no net change in position.
Which of the following statements regarding these flagged activities are correct?
- Trader X's activity of placing and quickly cancelling non-bona fide orders to manipulate price expectations constitutes illegal spoofing.Cevap
- Trader Y's transactions involving no genuine change in beneficial ownership constitute illegal wash trading designed to create artificial market activity.Cevap
- CTrader Y's conduct is permissible as long as the transactions are executed at prevailing market prices across registered national exchanges.
- DFINRA can independently file criminal felony charges against both traders for violations of securities fraud provisions.
Cevap
The correct statements are that Trader X's actions of placing non-bona fide orders to deceive the market constitute illegal spoofing, and Trader Y's offsetting trades between accounts under identical beneficial ownership constitute illegal wash trading.
Placing non-bona fide orders designed to be cancelled before execution to move market prices is prohibited as spoofing. Concurrently, buying and selling securities with no change in beneficial ownership creates artificial volume and constitutes wash trading. Both practices violate federal securities laws and FINRA conduct rules.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Market Manipulation Tactics (Spoofing and Wash Trading) and SRO Regulatory Limitations