A freelance audio transcriber is retained to transcribe a recorded executive meeting for a publicly traded pharmaceutical company. During the recording, the transcriber learns that the company's primary drug candidate received unexpected FDA approval. Before the information is made public, the transcriber passes this information to a family member, who immediately purchases 1,000 shares of the company's stock. Under federal securities regulations governing insider trading, which of the following statements correctly describes the legal liability of the transcriber and the family member?
- Both the transcriber (as the tipper) and the family member (as the tippee) can be held liable for insider trading violations.Cevap
- BOnly the family member can be held liable because the transcriber did not personally buy or sell any shares of the company stock.
- COnly the transcriber can be held liable because the family member is not an employee or corporate insider of the company.
- DNeither individual can be held liable because the transcriber is an independent contractor rather than an employee of the firm.
Cevap
Both the transcriber (as the tipper) and the family member (as the tippee) can be held liable for insider trading violations.
Under the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act and SEC rules, anyone who possesses material nonpublic information and breaches a duty of trust by sharing it (the tipper) or trading on it (the tippee) is subject to civil and criminal liability. The transcriber breached a duty of confidentiality owed as a temporary insider, making the tip unlawful. The family member acted on the tip knowing it was nonpublic material information, establishing liability for both parties.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Regulations
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s