Soru

Zorluk: OrtaProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

A compliance department at a broker-dealer is reviewing trade executions and order flow within a client's trading account. The audit identifies two distinct trading patterns:

1. The account frequently enters large buy limit orders well below the prevailing bid price without intending to execute them, attracting other market participants to raise their bids, and then immediately cancels the buy orders once the account's separate sell orders are executed at the higher price.
2. The account simultaneously places buy and sell orders for identical share quantities in a thinly traded equity security across two accounts owned by the same individual, resulting in no change in beneficial ownership.

Based on SEC regulations and FINRA rules regarding market manipulation, which of the following statements regarding these activities are CORRECT? (Select all that apply.)

  1. The pattern of entering non-bona fide orders to artificially move market prices and then canceling them prior to execution constitutes prohibited spoofing.Cevap
  2. Executing offsetting transactions that result in no actual change in beneficial ownership constitutes prohibited wash trading.Cevap
  3. C
    Executing matching buy and sell orders across accounts under common control is categorized as spoofing rather than wash trading if the trade increases overall transaction volume.
  4. D
    If FINRA confirms these market manipulation violations, it has sole jurisdiction to independently initiate criminal prosecution and file federal criminal charges against the account holder.

Cevap

The statement identifying non-bona fide order entry and cancellation as prohibited spoofing and the statement classifying transactions with no change in beneficial ownership as prohibited wash trading are both correct.
The statement classifying non-bona fide quote entry and cancellation as spoofing is correct because spoofing specifically involves placing non-bona fide orders to manipulate price expectations before canceling them. The statement classifying transactions without beneficial ownership changes as wash trading is correct because wash trading generates artificial volume and price signals without real risk or transfer of ownership.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Trading Pattern 1
Entering non-bona fide orders to manipulate market prices and subsequently canceling them constitutes spoofing under federal securities laws and SRO rules.
Spoofing relies on non-bona fide intent where orders are entered solely to create a misleading impression of market liquidity or price pressure.
2
Analyze Trading Pattern 2
Executing simultaneous buy and sell orders for the same account holder with no change in beneficial ownership constitutes wash trading.
Wash trading creates fake market activity and volume without exposing the trader to real economic risk or transferring true ownership.
3
Evaluate Regulatory Jurisdiction
FINRA can impose administrative sanctions, fines, and suspensions, but cannot bring criminal charges.
Criminal prosecutions fall under government entities like the U.S. Department of Justice, not self-regulatory organizations.

Anahtar Kavram

Identification of prohibited market manipulation tactics (spoofing vs. wash trading) and the jurisdictional boundaries of self-regulatory organizations.
Bu soruyu puanla