A translator working for an independent language services firm is retained to translate a confidential financial filing regarding an unannounced corporate acquisition by a publicly traded firm. Prior to the public disclosure of the acquisition, the translator purchases shares of the target company and tells a family member, who also purchases shares. Which of the following statements correctly describes the insider trading liability of the parties involved?
- Both the translator and the family member can be held liable for insider trading violations under federal securities laws.Cevap
- BOnly the translator is liable because non-employee family members receiving tips are exempt from federal insider trading regulations.
- CNeither party is liable because an independent contractor owes duties only to their direct employer, not to the publicly traded company.
- DThe family member is liable for insider trading, but the translator avoids liability because the translator did not receive direct monetary compensation for providing the information.
Cevap
Both the translator and the family member can be held liable for insider trading violations under federal securities laws.
Under federal securities laws and the Insider Trading Sanctions Act, both the person who improperly passes material nonpublic information (tipper) and the person who trades on it (tippee) can be held liable. The translator misapplied confidential business information entrusted to them, violating a duty of confidentiality under the misappropriation theory. The family member acted as a tippee by trading on information they knew or should have known was material and nonpublic.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Rules (Misappropriation Theory)
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s