Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorPublic Policy Feasibility and Impact Analysis

As the District Magistrate of a historical tier-2 city, you are evaluating a proposed public policy to introduce an exclusive Electric Feeder Bus Network in the congested heritage core to curb severe air pollution. However, a preliminary feasibility and impact analysis highlights three major bottlenecks: (1) local auto-rickshaw unions threaten indefinite strikes due to feared livelihood loss, (2) the narrow heritage grid cannot support heavy EV charging stations without relocating underground utilities, causing an estimated 14-month delay, and (3) the immediate capital expenditure for fleet procurement exceeds the municipal body's current annual budget. Which of the following courses of action represents the most administratively feasible and sustainable policy intervention?

  1. A
    Issue an immediate executive order banning all non-electric commercial vehicles from entering the heritage zone and deploy police forces to prevent driver blockades.
  2. Adopt a phased transition by introducing micro-EV feeders managed through a public-private partnership (PPP) model while granting targeted subsidies to existing auto-rickshaw operators to transition into feeder operators.Cevap
  3. C
    Cancel the electric bus proposal and immediately initiate a multi-billion dollar underground mass rapid transit system based on successful metropolitans.
  4. D
    Defer policy implementation indefinitely until state budgetary grants arrive and auto-rickshaw unions voluntarily agree to cease operations.

Cevap

The most administrative feasible action is to adopt a phased transition introducing micro-EV feeders through a public-private partnership while integrating auto-rickshaw operators via targeted subsidies and fleet management opportunities.
The correct response effectively tackles all three identified feasibility bottlenecks. Utilizing a Public-Private Partnership addresses the initial budget deficit, adopting micro-EVs bypasses major civil grid delays in narrow heritage corridors, and integrating existing auto-rickshaw drivers into the new feeder system protects local livelihoods and prevents labor strike risks.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Policy Bottlenecks
Identified three constraints: financial deficit, social opposition/livelihood threat, and technical delay in utility relocation.
Public policy feasibility requires simultaneously satisfying financial, operational, and socio-political constraints.
2
Evaluate Feasibility of Solutions against Constraints
Public-Private Partnerships resolve capital budget shortfalls; Micro-EV feeders fit narrow heritage roads without heavy utility overhauls; Subsidizing and absorbing existing operators converts stakeholder opposition into cooperative participation.
Sustainable policy implementation balances immediate feasibility with long-term environmental objectives.
3
Reject Unfeasible or Extremist Alternatives
Eliminated aggressive enforcement, capital-heavy unbudgeted projects, and policy paralysis.
Administrative decision-making prioritizes ethical compliance, procedural balance, and realistic execution over coercive or passive measures.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-Criteria Public Policy Impact and Feasibility Balancing
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Public Policy Feasibility and Impact Analysis

Bu konudan daha fazla soru