An irrigation canal system supplying critical agricultural blocks faces severe operational degradation due to silt accumulation, rampant aquatic weed growth, and unregulated fertilizer runoff. Match each Administrative Policy Intervention in List-I with its primary qualitative Cause-and-Effect Operational Outcome in List-II.
- Deployment of floating weed harvesters and targeted desiltation teams at identified canal choke pointsProvides immediate relief from localized waterlogging by rapidly restoring channel cross-sectional hydraulic capacity
- Implementation of upstream vegetative bio-strips and regulated agricultural runoff guidelinesTackles the root cause of recurrent biological blooms by reducing hyper-eutrophication over the long term
- Installation of automated hydro-metric sluice gates with real-time flow discharge monitoringPrevents downstream flooding surges during extreme rainfall through dynamic, responsive water-level modulation
- Establishment of participatory canal user committees for routine upkeep and dumping vigilanceFosters long-term civil stewardship to prevent anthropogenic obstruction and sustain channel upkeep
Cevap
The correct pairings link each administrative intervention directly to its functional outcome: clearing physical blockages provides immediate hydraulic relief; regulating upstream runoff addresses the root nutrient cause of weed growth; automated gates manage real-time flow surges; and community committees ensure long-term civic maintenance.
Each administrative action is matched to its direct operational outcome based on whether it provides immediate symptom relief, addresses underlying ecological causes, enables real-time hydraulic control, or establishes sustained civic oversight.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Qualitative Cause-and-Effect Analysis in Public Administration