With reference to the institutional transition from the Planning Commission to NITI Aayog in Indian economic planning, consider the following statements:
Statement I: NITI Aayog functions primarily as a policy think tank promoting a bottom-up approach to cooperative federalism, unlike the Planning Commission which pursued a top-down planning approach.
Statement II: Unlike the former Planning Commission, NITI Aayog possesses the statutory power to allocate central financial resources directly to state governments.
Statement III: Post-2017, NITI Aayog replaced Five-Year Plans with a long-term economic strategy framework comprising a 15-Year Vision, a 7-Year Strategy, and a 3-Year Action Agenda.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- Only Statement I and Statement IIICevap
- BOnly Statement I and Statement II
- COnly Statement II and Statement III
- DStatement I, Statement II, and Statement III
Cevap
Only Statement I and Statement III are correct.
Statement I and Statement III are factually accurate. NITI Aayog acts as an advisory body fostering cooperative federalism without possessing resource allocation mandate, and it restructured Indian economic planning into 15-year, 7-year, and 3-year frameworks following the end of Five-Year Plans in 2017.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Institutional architecture and functional differences between NITI Aayog and the Planning Commission
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s