In public administration, effective conflict resolution requires aligning appropriate negotiation strategies with specific administrative scenario dynamics. Match each stakeholder negotiation strategy on the left with its corresponding operational approach on the right.
- Integrative Negotiation (Win-Win Approach)Expanding available resources or reformulating project scope to create shared benefits for both community residents and developers.
- Distributive Negotiation (Win-Lose Approach)Allocating a strictly fixed, non-expandable budget where a financial gain for one department directly causes an equivalent reduction for another.
- De-escalation MediationIntervening through a neutral administrative facilitator to diffuse emotional tension and reopen communication channels during active public protest.
- Compromising StrategySecuring mutual, balanced concessions from all conflicting parties to establish an immediate, acceptable middle-ground settlement.
Cevap
Integrative Negotiation corresponds to expanding resources for shared benefits; Distributive Negotiation corresponds to fixed-resource zero-sum allocation; De-escalation Mediation corresponds to neutral facilitation during tense situations; and Compromising Strategy corresponds to mutual concessions for a middle-ground resolution.
Each strategy is accurately matched according to core negotiation theory: Integrative negotiation creates joint value; Distributive negotiation handles fixed-sum competitive bargaining; De-escalation mediation neutralizes interpersonal conflict; and Compromising achieves a pragmatic middle ground through reciprocal concessions.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Stakeholder Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Strategy Alignment