Read the following passage carefully:
The prevailing paradigm of agricultural modernization in post-colonial economies routinely privileges technocratic interventionism—emphasizing high-yielding monocultures, capital-intensive mechanization, and synthetic inputs—as the primary vehicle for food security. While this industrial model has historically boosted aggregate yields, it increasingly destabilizes rural socio-ecological systems by depleting soil organic matter, accelerating groundwater extraction, and heightening vulnerability to climate shocks. More fundamentally, such top-down administrative frameworks marginalize indigenous agroecological knowledge systems that rely on polycultural diversification, localized seed saving, and adaptive water harvesting. Rather than viewing peasant farming practices as inefficient relics awaiting state-directed obsolescence, contemporary development policy must recognize that ecological resilience and long-term agrarian sovereignty depend on integrating localized ecological stewardships with institutional support. A structural transformation of rural policy demands moving beyond market-led productivity metrics to evaluate agricultural sustainability through the dual lenses of ecological stewardship and rural equity.
Based on the passage above, which of the following statements accurately reflect the core arguments comprising the author's central thesis?
- Conventional agricultural modernization relies on technocratic, input-heavy frameworks that compromise rural socio-ecological stability.Cevap
- BTraditional peasant farming practices must be phased out through market-led incentives to ensure national food security.
- Long-term agrarian sustainability requires integrating localized agroecological knowledge into formal institutional policy frameworks.Cevap
- DTechnocratic agricultural interventions have consistently failed to produce any historical increase in aggregate crop yields.