Soru

Read the passage provided below carefully:

The imperative to mitigate catastrophic climate change has increasingly led policy analysts to evaluate solar radiation modification (SRM) as a temporary technological intervention. However, framing SRM as a standalone fix introduces profound ethical and operational dilemmas into global environmental policy. While advocates point to its potential to rapidly suppress global mean surface temperatures, such technical interventions risk creating a moral hazard by diluting political commitment to decarbonization and structural emissions reductions. Furthermore, the governance of atmospheric intervention demands an unprecedented level of transnational consensus, as unilateral deployment could induce severe regional hydrological disruptions and geopolitical friction. Standard regulatory frameworks, designed for bounded national externalities, are fundamentally ill-equipped to manage planetary-scale interventions characterized by non-linear risk cascades and radical uncertainty. Consequently, effective atmospheric governance requires moving beyond technocratic risk-benefit models toward institutional frameworks centered on epistemic humility, international co-deliberation, and strict accountability mechanisms. Without embedding technological options within holistic socio-ecological adaptation strategies, geoengineering risks transforming from an emergency mitigation mechanism into a source of systemic planetary instability.

Based on the passage provided above, which of the following statements accurately synthesize the central thesis and core message of the author?