Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the following passage carefully:

"Rapid urbanization across tier-2 cities has led to an exponential increase in municipal solid waste, overwhelming centralized landfill infrastructure. To address this crisis, several municipal corporations have mandated decentralized community-based composting and waste-sorting at source. Policy advocates argue that decentralizing waste handling reduces transport fuel costs, minimizes greenhouse gas emissions from landfills, and fosters civic responsibility among urban households. However, municipal authorities have directed that financial subsidies for localized composting units will only be granted to neighborhood associations that achieve a minimum 80 percent household participation rate within six months. Supporters of this policy clause maintain that financial incentives must be tied to measurable public compliance to prevent the misallocation of civic funds toward inactive infrastructure."

Statement: The policy argument for conditioning financial subsidies on an 80 percent household participation rate assumes that neighborhood associations have the institutional capacity or leverage to influence household waste-sorting behavior.

Is the above statement True or False regarding the underlying premise of the passage?

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

The statement is True. The policy argument inherently relies on the premise that neighborhood associations can actively influence household sorting behavior to meet the target threshold.
The statement accurately identifies an essential premise. Tying financial subsidies for localized composting units directly to neighborhood association performance requires assuming that these associations possess the operational or social leverage needed to drive household participation to the 80 percent threshold.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and policy mechanism in the passage.
The passage outlines a policy where financial subsidies for composting units are awarded to neighborhood associations only if they achieve an 80% household participation rate.
Understanding the linkage between the incentive (subsidies) and the target entity (neighborhood associations) is essential for evaluating underlying premises.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negate the statement: 'Neighborhood associations do NOT possess the institutional capacity or leverage to influence household waste-sorting behavior.'
If negating a premise causes the core argument or policy logic to collapse, then that premise is logically necessary.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the author's logic.
If associations cannot influence household sorting, conditioning their subsidy on household participation is futile and illogical. Thus, the original premise must hold.
A valid assumption must bridge the gap between granting subsidies to associations and achieving household compliance.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Underlying Assumptions in Policy Contexts
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Passage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Bu konudan daha fazla soru