Read the passage given below carefully:
The rapid proliferation of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)—encompassing open, interoperable foundational rails for digital identity, fast payments, and data exchange—is frequently heralded as a transformative paradigm for inclusive governance and public service delivery in developing nations. Proponents contend that modular, open-source architectures prevent long-term vendor lock-in, drastically reduce administrative transaction costs for targeted welfare distribution, and catalyze domestic technological innovation. However, integrating these complex technical systems into state apparatuses without commensurate institutional capacity creates profound administrative vulnerabilities. When sovereign governments rely on private technology contractors or foreign proprietary frameworks for core system maintenance and algorithmic auditing, the boundary between public accountability and commercial influence inevitably blurs. Furthermore, the mandatory centralized aggregation or seamless linking of citizen identity data heightens state surveillance risks and systemic exposure to catastrophic cybersecurity breaches, especially within jurisdictions lacking independent statutory data protection authorities. Consequently, while DPI yields substantial operational efficiencies, its sustainable implementation is fundamentally contingent not merely on technical throughput, but on instituting robust democratic oversight, maintaining sovereign regulatory autonomy, and enshrining enforceable privacy safeguards to preserve constitutional rights.
Based on the passage provided above, which of the following statements accurately capture the author's central thesis and main arguments?
- The transformative potential of Digital Public Infrastructure cannot be realized through technical deployment alone, as its long-term success requires robust institutional safeguards, democratic oversight, and statutory privacy protections.Cevap
- Deploying interconnected digital rails in the absence of independent statutory regulatory bodies heightens state surveillance hazards, cybersecurity exposure, and privatized public accountability.Cevap
- CPrivate technology contractors must be entirely banned from participation in state digital infrastructure projects to prevent commercial influence and eliminate data security risks.
- DThe primary core objective of Digital Public Infrastructure is to replace foreign software with domestic open-source architectures to lower welfare transaction costs.