Read the given statements and determine which of the conclusions can be logically drawn from them.
Statement I: According to the new administrative guidelines, any public grievance petition that remains pending for more than 45 days is automatically escalated to the State Vigilance Commission.
Statement II: A significant number of petitions regarding rural water supply have remained unresolved for the past two months.
Conclusion I: Several petitions related to rural water supply will be escalated to the State Vigilance Commission.
Conclusion II: The department handling rural water supply is the most inefficient department in the state administration.
Which of the following options is correct?
- Only Conclusion I followsCevap
- BOnly Conclusion II follows
- CBoth Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow
- DNeither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II follows
Cevap
Only Conclusion I follows.
The correct answer accurately evaluates both conclusions. Conclusion I is a direct logical deduction because a period of two months exceeds the 45-day threshold, triggering the automatic escalation detailed in the first statement. Conclusion II is an extreme, unwarranted generalization because the text offers no comparative data about other departments.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Statement and Conclusions or Inferences