Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaConstitutional Developments, Transfer of Power, and Partition of India

Match the following committees and proposals from the British colonial era with their primary constitutional focus or recommendation:

  • Muddiman Committee (1924)Inquired into the operational working of dyarchy established under the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms
  • Butler Committee (1927)Examined the nature of Paramountcy and relations between the British Crown and Princely States
  • C. Rajagopalachari Formula (1944)Proposed a post-war plebiscite in contiguous Muslim-majority districts to decide on separation
  • Sapru Committee (1945)Rejected the creation of Pakistan while advocating joint electorates with reservation of seats

Cevap

Muddiman Committee (1924) matches with inquiring into dyarchy under the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms; Butler Committee (1927) matches with examining Crown-Princely States paramountcy; C. Rajagopalachari Formula (1944) matches with proposing a post-war plebiscite in Muslim-majority districts; and Sapru Committee (1945) matches with rejecting partition in favor of joint electorates.
Each body or proposal is correctly paired with its specific historical mandate: the 1924 Muddiman Committee assessed provincial dyarchy under the 1919 Act; the 1927 Butler Committee examined Paramountcy over Princely States; the 1944 Rajagopalachari Formula proposed a plebiscite for separation in Muslim-majority districts; and the 1945 Sapru Committee rejected partition in favor of an undivided federation with joint electorates.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the historical mandate of the Muddiman Committee (1924)
It investigated administrative defects and the working of dyarchy in British Indian provinces established by the 1919 Act.
Demands from Indian political leaders for constitutional revision prompted the colonial government to examine dyarchy's efficacy.
2
Determine the focus of the Butler Committee (1927)
It defined the scope of Crown Paramountcy over the Princely States.
Princely rulers sought formal clarity on sovereign rights relative to the British Crown.
3
Analyze the key clause of the C. Rajagopalachari Formula (1944)
It offered a plebiscite mechanism in Muslim-majority districts to determine whether to separate from India.
The formula aimed to secure Muslim League cooperation for immediate independence.
4
Examine the conclusions of the Sapru Committee Report (1945)
It opposed the division of India into separate sovereign states and recommended joint electorates with safeguards.
The non-party initiative sought to preserve national unity while resolving minority representation concerns.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional Committees, Commission Mandates, and Transfer of Power Proposals
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Constitutional Developments, Transfer of Power, and Partition of India