Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaSituational Ethics and Administrative Dilemmas

You are the Director of a State Social Welfare Department overseeing the distribution of old-age pensions. A new government mandate requires mandatory biometric authentication by tomorrow to eliminate 'ghost beneficiaries' and prevent fund leakage. However, field reports indicate that approximately 15% of genuine elderly beneficiaries in remote districts are failing the authentication due to faded fingerprints or poor network connectivity. The Finance Ministry insists on strictly enforcing the deadline to meet audit compliance. As an administrator balancing procedural integrity and public welfare, which of the following is the most appropriate course of action?

  1. Deploy block-level officers to manually verify the genuine elderly cases whose biometrics failed, while seeking a conditional extension specifically for this verified vulnerable group.Cevap
  2. B
    Strictly enforce the deadline by halting payments to all unverified accounts and issue a notification for affected individuals to re-register at district headquarters.
  3. C
    Suspend the biometric verification mandate entirely across the state to prevent any humanitarian crisis and revert indefinitely to the previous manual disbursement system.
  4. D
    Authorize the automatic system approval of the remaining 15% of cases without further verification to ensure uninterrupted pension disbursement and avoid political backlash.

Cevap

Deploy block-level officers to manually verify the genuine elderly cases whose biometrics failed, while seeking a conditional extension specifically for this verified vulnerable group.
The correct answer represents the most balanced and ethical administrative approach. It upholds the overarching goal of the government mandate (authenticating beneficiaries) but introduces a practical, procedurally sound fallback mechanism (manual verification by designated officers) to protect genuine beneficiaries from being penalized by technical glitches. It respects both the rule of law and the spirit of public service.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the competing priorities in the scenario.
The primary conflict is between enforcing procedural rules (Finance Ministry's mandate to eliminate ghost beneficiaries) and fulfilling the core administrative duty (ensuring genuine elderly beneficiaries are not deprived of welfare due to technical glitches).
Identifying the core ethical tension is essential to finding a proportionate administrative response.
2
Evaluate the viability and ethics of strict enforcement versus complete abandonment.
Strict enforcement harms innocent, vulnerable citizens. Complete abandonment of the policy allows corruption (ghost beneficiaries) to continue.
Administrative decisions must avoid extremes and seek middle-ground solutions that address both accountability and humanitarian concerns.
3
Formulate a localized, procedurally sound fallback mechanism.
Using existing administrative machinery (block-level officers) for manual verification targets the specific 15% failure group, maintaining the integrity of the 85% who succeeded while formally requesting an extension for the exceptions.
This maintains respect for the statutory goal while establishing a legal, documented workaround for the technical failures.

Anahtar Kavram

Balancing Statutory Compliance with Humanitarian Governance and Proportionality
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Situational Ethics and Administrative Dilemmas

Bu konudan daha fazla soru