In public administration, civil servants must apply appropriate conflict resolution and negotiation strategies depending on stakeholder dynamics. Match each conflict resolution strategy in List I with its corresponding administrative implementation scenario in List II.
- Integrative Interest-Based NegotiationFormulating a joint regulatory framework that permits industrial expansion while guaranteeing green belt preservation and community employment quotas.
- Unilateral Executive MandateEnforcing an immediate non-consultative eviction order against informal street vendors without providing alternative vending zones or grievance hearings.
- Passive Avoidance and DeferralRepeatedly postponing statutory public consultations on land acquisition in the expectation that local community agitation will erode over time.
- Mechanical Positional CompromiseDividing disputed canal water allocation strictly fifty-fifty between two agricultural districts without assessing actual crop water requirements.
Cevap
Integrative Interest-Based Negotiation pairs with formulating a joint framework balancing industrial expansion and green belt preservation. Unilateral Executive Mandate pairs with enforcing an immediate non-consultative eviction order. Passive Avoidance and Deferral pairs with repeatedly postponing statutory public consultations. Mechanical Positional Compromise pairs with dividing water allocation strictly fifty-fifty regardless of crop needs.
Each conflict resolution model corresponds directly to its administrative practice: Integrative Negotiation creates multi-benefit frameworks; Unilateral Mandate uses forced compliance; Avoidance relies on procrastination; and Positional Compromise splits demands arbitrarily without functional analysis.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Stakeholder Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Strategy in Public Administration
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s