Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorRevolt of 1857, Peasant Struggles, and Tribal Uprisings

With reference to the Kol Rebellion (1831–1832) in colonial India, consider the following statements:

1. The rebellion was launched under the leadership of Buddho Bhagat against the large-scale transfer of tribal lands to non-tribal merchants and landholders.
2. The geographic extent of the uprising encompassed major regions across Chota Nagpur, Singhbhum, Ranchi, and Hazaribagh.
3. As a direct administrative outcome to protect tribal land tenure immediately following the suppression of this revolt, the British colonial government enacted the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act of 1908.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 and 2 onlyCevap
  2. B
    2 and 3 only
  3. C
    3 only
  4. D
    1, 2, and 3

Cevap

1 and 2 only
Statements 1 and 2 accurately state historical facts regarding the Kol Rebellion (1831–1832). The Kols of Chota Nagpur rose under leaders like Buddho Bhagat primarily due to land alienation caused by non-tribal contractors (Thikadars) and British taxation policies. The movement engulfed Ranchi, Singhbhum, Hazaribagh, and Palamau. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act was passed in 1908 following Birsa Munda's Ulgulan (1899–1900), not the Kol Rebellion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding leadership and cause of the Kol Rebellion
Statement 1 is correct. The Kols of Chota Nagpur revolted in 1831–1832 under Buddho Bhagat and other leaders against the dispossession of their ancestral lands by foreign outsiders (Dikus), oppressive revenue farming, and British administrative extension.
Verifying the primary leadership and socio-economic grievances of the Kol tribesmen.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding the geographic extent of the rebellion
Statement 2 is correct. The uprising spread rapidly across a vast area including Ranchi, Singhbhum, Hazaribagh, Palamau, and Manbhum.
Confirming the regional spread of the 1831-32 uprising across the Chota Nagpur region.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act of 1908
Statement 3 is incorrect. The Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act (CNT Act) was passed in 1908 in the aftermath of Birsa Munda's Ulgulan (1899–1900), not the Kol Rebellion of 1831–1832.
Distinguishing between legislative outcomes associated with distinct tribal movements separated by over seven decades.

Anahtar Kavram

Kol Rebellion (1831–1832) leadership, geographic extent, and colonial agrarian legislation timelines
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Revolt of 1857, Peasant Struggles, and Tribal Uprisings

Bu konudan daha fazla soru