Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorCourse of Action

Statement: An internal financial audit has revealed that a prominent state-funded university has systematically inflated its student enrollment figures over the past five years to illegally secure massive surplus infrastructural grants from the Higher Education Ministry.

Courses of Action:
I. The Higher Education Ministry should immediately suspend the university's academic charter and invalidate the ongoing academic sessions until the misappropriated funds are fully recovered by the state exchequer.
II. The government should immediately freeze all further discretionary funding to the institution, institute a high-level investigative committee to identify the culpable administrators, and appoint a temporary oversight board to ensure uninterrupted classes for genuine students.

Which of the following logically follows?

  1. A
    Only course of action I follows
  2. Only course of action II followsCevap
  3. C
    Either course of action I or II follows
  4. D
    Neither course of action I nor II follows
  5. E
    Both courses of action I and II follow

Cevap

Only course of action II logically follows, as it addresses the financial fraud while protecting the academic interests of innocent students.
The correct answer identifies that only the second proposed action is logically sound. In public administration, a valid course of action must solve the immediate problem without creating a disproportionately larger crisis. Course of action II achieves this by stopping the financial fraud and investigating the culprits while explicitly protecting the academic careers of genuine students. Course of action I is invalid because invalidating all academic sessions is an extreme, collateral-damage-heavy response that unfairly punishes innocent students for the administration's crimes.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the problem presented in the statement.
The core problem is financial fraud committed by the university administration through inflated enrollment figures to secure surplus government grants.
Identifying the perpetrators (administrators) and the potential victims (students, taxpayers) is necessary to evaluate the appropriateness of any proposed action.
2
Evaluate Course of Action I against administrative principles.
Course of action I proposes suspending the academic charter and invalidating ongoing sessions. This action penalizes innocent students for the crimes of the administration.
A valid course of action must be proportionate and must not inflict massive collateral damage on innocent stakeholders.
3
Evaluate Course of Action II against administrative principles.
Course of action II proposes freezing funds to stop the crime, investigating the guilty administrators, and appointing a board to keep classes running for real students.
This is a balanced, ethical, and highly feasible policy that resolves the crisis without harming the public.
4
Synthesize the evaluations to select the correct option.
Since only the second action is a valid, proportionate response, 'Only course of action II follows' is the correct conclusion.
Finalizing the logical deduction based on the validity of each individual course of action.

Anahtar Kavram

Proportionate Administrative Action and Stakeholder Protection
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Course of Action

Bu konudan daha fazla soru