Soru

Read the following passage carefully:

The contemporary governance of ecological restoration in degraded river basins increasingly reflects an unresolved friction between technocratic re-wilding paradigms and indigenous hydrological knowledge systems. Standardized environmental management frameworks routinely privilege quantitative metrics—such as nutrient load thresholds, hydrological flow modeling, and engineered biodiversity indices—thereby conceptualizing riverine ecosystems primarily as bio-physical infrastructure subject to algorithmic optimization. While these empirical interventions facilitate measurable short-term ecological stabilization, they frequently misinterpret river systems by detaching ecological health from the historical, cultural, and stewardship relationships embedded within local communities. Indigenous eco-hydrological perspectives, conversely, understand river basins not as static natural capital requiring technical remediation, but as dynamic, socio-ecological relational networks where human agency and ecological integrity are co-constitutive. By reducing restoration efforts to top-down biophysical engineering, state-led environmental authorities inadvertently marginalize traditional ecological governance structures, ultimately compromising the long-term socio-ecological resilience of the watershed. Consequently, sustainable river basin restoration demands a fundamental epistemological shift from unilateral technocratic management toward pluralistic governance frameworks that integrate localized socio-cultural tenure with empirical ecological science.

Which of the following statements jointly capture the author's primary argument regarding river basin restoration?