Consider the following statements regarding the nature and enforceability of Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) under the Constitution of India:
1. Fundamental Rights primarily operate as negative obligations restricting State action, whereas Directive Principles serve as positive obligations directing State action toward welfare goals.
2. Any law enacted by Parliament to implement any Directive Principle automatically overrides all Fundamental Rights contained in Part III.
3. A law cannot be declared unconstitutional by courts solely on the ground that it violates or fails to implement a Directive Principle of State Policy.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- 1 and 3 onlyCevap
- B1 and 2 only
- C2 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3
Cevap
Statements 1 and 3 are correct, while Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 1 accurately reflects the functional distinction: Fundamental Rights limit State authority to protect individual freedoms (negative obligations), whereas Directive Principles instruct the State to act positively toward socio-economic welfare. Statement 3 correctly identifies that because Directive Principles are non-justiciable (Article 37), courts cannot invalidate legislation solely for contravening Part IV provisions.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Harmony and Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy