Soru

Zorluk: OrtaSituational Ethics and Administrative Dilemmas

You are the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) overseeing land acquisition for a critical state irrigation canal. The deadline to hand over the acquired land to the engineering department is tomorrow. The state government is strictly monitoring the timeline. However, a group of marginalized farmers has not received their mandatory compensation due to a technical glitch in the centralized digital treasury system. They are peacefully protesting at the site, refusing to vacate until the compensation is credited. The engineering contractor demands that you use police force to clear the site immediately to avoid project delays. As an administrator, which of the following is the most appropriate course of action?

  1. Temporarily pause the physical eviction, urgently coordinate with the treasury department to resolve the glitch, and communicate a concrete resolution timeline to the farmers.Cevap
  2. B
    Order the immediate deployment of police force to disperse the protesters and secure the site, ensuring the government's project deadline is strictly met.
  3. C
    Direct the engineering contractor to distribute equivalent cash payments to the farmers from their own funds to bypass the treasury delay.
  4. D
    Halt all land acquisition operations across the entire district indefinitely until the treasury software undergoes a comprehensive audit and upgrade.

Cevap

Temporarily pause the physical eviction, urgently coordinate with the treasury department to resolve the glitch, and communicate a concrete resolution timeline to the farmers.
The correct answer balances empathy, administrative duty, and public order. It respects the statutory right of the farmers to receive their rightful compensation before displacement while actively utilizing official channels to resolve the systemic issue and resume the project as quickly as possible.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the competing priorities in the scenario.
The conflict is between meeting a strict project deadline and respecting the legal rights of citizens who are victims of an administrative error.
Administrative decision-making requires weighing public interest against individual rights and procedural fairness.
2
Evaluate the demands of the engineering contractor.
The demand to use police force is rejected as disproportionate, given that the farmers are protesting peacefully for a legitimate grievance caused by the administration.
Force should be a last resort, never used to cover up administrative shortcomings.
3
Determine the most balanced and legally sound resolution.
The best course is to temporarily hold the eviction, fix the root cause (the treasury glitch) through proper channels, and maintain transparent communication with the affected farmers.
This upholds constitutional values, maintains public trust, and follows established statutory procedures without overreacting.

Anahtar Kavram

Administrative proportionality, due process, and stakeholder communication during procedural failures
Bu soruyu puanla