Match each administrative stakeholder conflict scenario in List I with its most appropriate conflict resolution strategy in List II.
- Local residents protesting severe traffic congestion caused by a newly opened commercial shopping complex.Implementing peak-hour traffic management and requiring the developer to provide dedicated off-street parking.
- Two municipal departments disputing the financial responsibility for repairing a shared drainage channel.Convening an inter-departmental committee chaired by a senior administrator to arbitrate cost-sharing based on usage.
- Street vendors demanding permanent vending stalls in a space-constrained urban transit hub.Establishing time-shared vending zones and regulated shifts without blocking commuter pathways.
- An industrial facility seeking extended deadlines for pollution control upgrades amidst protests by local environmental activists.Formulating a binding, time-bound compliance plan backed by third-party environmental audits.
Cevap
Each stakeholder conflict scenario is matched with a resolution strategy that applies proportional administrative intervention, balancing public welfare, institutional coordination, and regulatory compliance.
The correct matches align each specific administrative challenge with a balanced negotiation strategy. Commercial traffic issues require developer accountability and traffic management; inter-agency budget disputes require senior administrative arbitration; vendor congestion demands time-shared spatial regulation; and environmental compliance requires structured, independently audited timelines.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Proportional Stakeholder Negotiation and Administrative Conflict Resolution