Logical Reasoning and Analytical Ability

493 soru

Soru 441Soru

Eight friends—A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H—are seated around a square table. Four of them sit at the four corners of the table and face the center, while the other four sit in the middle of each of the four sides and face outward (away from the center).

The following information is known about their seating arrangement:
• A sits third to the left of C, who does not sit at any of the corners.
• E sits second to the right of A.
• Only two people sit between E and B.
• D sits to the immediate left of H, who faces the center.
• H is not an immediate neighbour of A.
• F is not an immediate neighbour of C.

Based on the given arrangement, which of the following statements is true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: E sits exactly opposite to G.

Cevap

The true statement is that E sits exactly opposite to G.
Based on the fully deduced arrangement (clockwise starting from top-middle): C (Out), H (In), D (Out), E (In), F (Out), A (In), B (Out), G (In). Checking the correct statement: E is at the bottom-right corner and G is at the top-left corner, making them diagonally opposite to each other.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the basic orientation and place C and A.
C is at a middle position (facing outward). A is placed 3 positions counter-clockwise from C (since left of outward is counter-clockwise). This places A at a corner facing the center.
The first clue provides a fixed starting relationship. 'C does not sit at a corner' confirms C is in the middle of a side.
2
Determine the positions of E and B based on A's position.
Since A faces the center, right is counter-clockwise. E is placed 2 positions counter-clockwise from A (at the next corner). B is placed 3 positions away from E, which lands exactly opposite C on the middle of a side.
The clues 'E sits second to the right of A' and 'Only two people sit between E and B' dictate these exact relative placements.
3
Identify the positions of H and D.
H must face the center, meaning H is at a corner. The only corners left are adjacent to C. Since H cannot be next to A, H takes the corner on C's right. Because H faces inward, its immediate left is the adjacent middle seat, which is given to D.
Combining 'H faces the center', 'D is immediate left of H', and 'H is not adjacent to A' leaves only one valid corner-middle pair for H and D.
4
Place the remaining friends F and G.
Only one middle seat and one corner seat remain. Since F cannot be next to C, F takes the remaining middle seat. G takes the remaining corner seat.
Process of elimination based on the constraint 'F is not an immediate neighbour of C' perfectly resolves the final two seats.

Anahtar Kavram

Mixed-orientation spatial reasoning and relative directional assignment in closed shapes.
Soru 442Soru

During a family reunion, a guest asks Victor, a married man, about the identity of a young man standing across the room. Victor replies, 'The father of that young man's sister is the husband of my wife's mother.' What is the relationship of the young man to Victor?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: brother-in-law; Brother-in-law; brother in law; Brother in law; Brother In Law

Cevap

Brother-in-law
Breaking down Victor's statement: 'my wife's mother' is his mother-in-law, and her 'husband' is his father-in-law. On the other side, 'the father of that young man's sister' is simply the young man's father. Therefore, the young man's father is Victor's father-in-law. This means the young man is the brother of Victor's wife, making him Victor's brother-in-law.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the second part of Victor's statement: 'the husband of my wife's mother'.
Victor's wife's mother is his mother-in-law. Her husband is Victor's father-in-law.
Breaking down complex relational chains starting from the speaker's perspective makes it easier to find the anchor person.
2
Analyze the first part of Victor's statement: 'The father of that young man's sister'.
The sister of the young man shares the same father as the young man. Therefore, this refers to the young man's own father.
Simplifying the subject of the sentence directly links the relative to the young man.
3
Equate the two simplified components.
The young man's father is Victor's father-in-law.
The sentence states that the person from Step 2 'is' the person from Step 1.
4
Determine the final relationship based on the equation.
Since the young man's father is Victor's father-in-law, the young man must be the brother of Victor's wife. Therefore, the young man is Victor's brother-in-law.
Connecting the young man's immediate family to Victor's immediate family provides the specific relational term.

Anahtar Kavram

Blood Relations (Pointing Narrative)
Soru 443Soru

Six executives (K, L, M, N, O, and P) are seated around an equilateral triangular table. Three of them sit at the three corners, facing the center of the table. The other three sit exactly at the midpoints of the three sides, facing outward (away from the center).

Based on the following conditions, select all statements that are true regarding their final seating positions:

1. M sits at the midpoint of one of the sides.
2. N sits third to the right of M.
3. P sits second to the left of N.
4. O sits to the immediate right of P.
5. K is not an immediate neighbor of M.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: O sits exactly between N and P.; K sits second to the left of O.

Cevap

The correct statements are that O sits exactly between N and P, and K sits second to the left of O.
Based on the verified seating chart, N is at the top corner and P is at the bottom-right corner, leaving the right midpoint exactly between them for O. Furthermore, O is at the right midpoint facing outward; moving two spaces to O's left (counter-clockwise) leads to K at the left midpoint.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the left/right orientations based on facing direction.
For corner seats (facing IN), Left is Clockwise and Right is Counter-Clockwise. For midpoint seats (facing OUT), Left is Counter-Clockwise and Right is Clockwise.
Establishing relative direction mapping is essential before placing any individuals in mixed-facing geometry.
2
Place M and locate N.
Assume M sits at the bottom midpoint (facing out). Since M's right is clockwise, moving three positions clockwise places N at the top corner (facing in).
Condition 1 and 2 give a direct relationship between a midpoint and a corner.
3
Locate P based on N's position.
N is at a corner facing in, so N's left is clockwise. Moving two positions clockwise from the top corner places P at the bottom-right corner (facing in).
Condition 3 connects N to P deterministically.
4
Locate O relative to P.
P faces in, so P's right is counter-clockwise. Moving one position counter-clockwise from P places O at the right midpoint (facing out).
Condition 4 uses P's position to place O.
5
Place K and L using the negative condition.
The remaining seats are the left midpoint and the bottom-left corner. M is at the bottom midpoint. K cannot be M's neighbor, so K must take the left midpoint (facing out). L takes the remaining bottom-left corner (facing in).
Condition 5 eliminates the only other open spot for K, completing the seating chart.

Anahtar Kavram

Positional Mapping in Mixed-Orientation Polygons
Soru 444Soru

Evaluate whether the following conclusion logically follows from the given statement.

Statement: To enhance urban air quality by 2026, the Municipal Corporation has mandated that all commercial delivery fleets operating within the city limits must transition to 100% electric vehicles (EVs). Delivery agencies failing to meet this mandate will have their commercial operating licenses suspended.

Conclusion: A commercial delivery agency that successfully transitions 100% of its fleet to electric vehicles will definitely have its commercial operating license renewed without suspension.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The conclusion does not logically follow (False).
The original statement explicitly dictates the consequence of failing the mandate (license suspension). However, it does not state that transitioning to EVs is the only requirement for keeping a license. The conclusion falsely assumes that complying with this single mandate guarantees the license will not be suspended, entirely ignoring other potential regulatory requirements that a business must follow.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional relationship established in the original statement.
The statement defines a strict penalty condition: IF an agency does not transition to 100% EVs, THEN its license will be suspended.
Mapping the exact cause-and-effect relationship prevents the introduction of outside assumptions.
2
Evaluate the proposed conclusion against the established conditions.
The conclusion claims that IF an agency transitions to 100% EVs, THEN its license will definitely not be suspended.
This step tests for the formal logical fallacy known as denying the antecedent (or the fallacy of the inverse).
3
Determine formal logical validity based only on the provided text.
Complying with the EV mandate successfully avoids one specific cause of suspension, but it does not eliminate all other possible causes of suspension that are not mentioned in the text.
A valid inference cannot guarantee a positive outcome based solely on the avoidance of one specific negative condition.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical Deduction and Identifying the Fallacy of the Inverse
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 445Soru

A genealogist is tracing the lineage of a particular family and uncovers the following records:
• Morgan is the only sibling of Robin.
• Robin is legally married to Taylor.
• Taylor is the biological mother of Jamie.
��� Casey is the son of Morgan.

Based exclusively on these genealogical records, which of the following conclusions is definitively true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Casey and Jamie are first cousins.

Cevap

Casey and Jamie are first cousins.
Based on the records, Robin is the father of Jamie (being the spouse of Jamie's mother, Taylor). Morgan is the sibling of Robin. Since Casey is the child of Morgan, and Jamie is the child of Robin, Casey and Jamie are the children of siblings. This definitively makes them first cousins. Their exact genders do not change this cousin relationship.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine Robin's relationship to Jamie.
Robin is the father of Jamie.
The records state Taylor is Jamie's mother and Robin is married to Taylor.
2
Determine the relationship between Morgan and Robin.
Morgan and Robin are siblings.
This is explicitly stated in the first genealogical record.
3
Establish the relationship between the two children, Casey and Jamie.
Casey and Jamie are first cousins.
Casey is the child of Morgan. Jamie is the child of Robin. Because their parents (Morgan and Robin) are siblings, the children are first cousins.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical deduction of generational relationships while avoiding gender assumptions based on proper names.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 446Soru

Analyze the provided statements and determine which of the conclusions can be logically deduced.

Statement 1: The statutory medical board's updated mandate prohibits physicians from prescribing a branded therapeutic drug if a bioequivalent generic alternative is currently listed in the national formulary.
Statement 2: Dr. Lin, a practicing physician under the board's jurisdiction, strictly complies with all medical board mandates without exception.
Statement 3: During a consultation this morning, Dr. Lin prescribed a branded therapeutic drug for a patient's acute allergic reaction.

Conclusion I: A bioequivalent generic alternative for the prescribed allergy medication was not listed in the national formulary this morning.
Conclusion II: The prescribed branded therapeutic drug is more effective for acute allergic reactions than any generic counterpart.

Which of the following is correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Only Conclusion I follows

Cevap

Only Conclusion I follows.
The correct answer identifies that only the first conclusion is a valid deduction. Statement 1 creates a strict rule: if X (generic listed) is true, then Y (prescribing branded) cannot happen. Statement 2 ensures the rule is strictly followed. Statement 3 tells us Y (prescribing branded) did happen. By the logical law of modus tollens, if Y happened under strict adherence to the rule, X must have been false. Therefore, the generic was not listed, proving Conclusion I is perfectly true. Conclusion II is invalid because it relies on outside knowledge about drug efficacy, which is never mentioned in the text.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional rule established in Statement 1.
The rule dictates: If a generic alternative is listed, a branded drug cannot be prescribed.
To establish the foundational logical premise governing the scenario.
2
Incorporate the factual evidence from Statements 2 and 3.
Dr. Lin followed the rules perfectly, yet successfully prescribed a branded therapeutic drug this morning.
To connect the theoretical rule to the real-world action taken by the subject.
3
Apply deductive reasoning to evaluate Conclusion I.
Since Dr. Lin followed the rule and prescribed the branded drug, the condition preventing its prescription (the generic being listed) must not have been true. Thus, Conclusion I perfectly aligns with the facts.
To test the first conclusion using contrapositive logic (modus tollens).
4
Evaluate Conclusion II against the provided text.
Conclusion II introduces concepts of medical effectiveness ('more effective'), which appear nowhere in the original statements.
To ensure conclusions strictly derive from the text, filtering out unwarranted external assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical Deduction (Modus Tollens) and Differentiating Inference from Assumption
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 447Soru

Assume the following propositions regarding a fictional collection of artifacts to be strictly true.

Propositions:
1. All enchanted swords are cursed objects.
2. No cursed object is a healing potion.
3. Some healing potions are glowing artifacts.

Which of the following conclusions logically follow with absolute certainty from these propositions? (Select all valid conclusions)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No enchanted sword is a healing potion.; Some glowing artifacts are not cursed objects.

Cevap

The valid deductions are that no enchanted sword is a healing potion, and some glowing artifacts are not cursed objects.
The correct conclusions rely on strict categorical boundaries. Because all enchanted swords are inside the cursed objects category, and the cursed objects category is entirely separated from healing potions, the first valid conclusion holds. Because the glowing artifacts category overlaps with the healing potions category, and healing potions are completely separate from cursed objects, that overlapping portion must be separate from cursed objects, making the second valid conclusion true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between enchanted swords and healing potions.
It is deduced that no enchanted sword is a healing potion.
By combining the universal affirmative proposition (All enchanted swords are cursed objects) and the universal negative proposition (No cursed object is a healing potion), we determine that a subset of a restricted set is also restricted from the mutually exclusive set.
2
Analyze the relationship between glowing artifacts and cursed objects.
It is deduced that some glowing artifacts are not cursed objects.
From the third proposition, a subset of glowing artifacts are healing potions. From the second proposition, no healing potions are cursed objects. Therefore, the portion of glowing artifacts that are healing potions are definitely not cursed objects.
3
Evaluate the reverse universal claim about cursed objects and enchanted swords.
The claim that all cursed objects are enchanted swords is invalid.
Universal affirmative propositions cannot be simply reversed without committing a logical fallacy.
4
Evaluate the implied relationship between enchanted swords and glowing artifacts.
The claim that some enchanted swords are glowing artifacts is invalid.
No premise connects enchanted swords to glowing artifacts. Assuming an intersection without explicit evidence is a deductive error.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying deductive reasoning to universal affirmative, universal negative, and particular affirmative categorical propositions.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 448Soru

Evaluate the logical consistency of the deductions based on the provided assertions. Treat the assertions as absolute truths, irrespective of factual reality.

Assertions:
(A) All algorithms are sequences.
(B) No sequence is a paradox.
(C) Some paradoxes are loops.

Deductions:
[X] No algorithm is a paradox.
[Y] Some loops are not sequences.
[Z] Some sequences are loops.

Based on the rules of syllogism, which of the following best describes the validity of these deductions?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deductions [X] and [Y] are the only valid conclusions.

Cevap

Deductions [X] and [Y] are the only valid conclusions.
Deduction [X] is valid because algorithms are a subset of sequences, and sequences are entirely separate from paradoxes; therefore, algorithms must be separate from paradoxes. Deduction [Y] is valid because the specific paradoxes that are also loops cannot be sequences (since no paradox is a sequence), meaning at least some loops are not sequences. Deduction [Z] is invalid because no premise establishes an overlap between sequences and loops.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define the sets and their relationships based on the assertions using set notation.
Let AA = Algorithms, SS = Sequences, PP = Paradoxes, and LL = Loops. (A) gives ASA \subseteq S. (B) gives SP=S \cap P = \emptyset. (C) gives PLP \cap L \neq \emptyset.
Converting abstract verbal statements into strict set-theory relationships prevents intuitive biases.
2
Evaluate Deduction [X]: 'No algorithm is a paradox.'
Since ASA \subseteq S and SP=S \cap P = \emptyset, it logically follows that AP=A \cap P = \emptyset. Therefore, Deduction [X] is valid.
A subset (AA) cannot intersect with a set (PP) if its superset (SS) is entirely disjoint from that set.
3
Evaluate Deduction [Y]: 'Some loops are not sequences.'
From (C), there is at least one element xx in PLP \cap L. Because SP=S \cap P = \emptyset from (B), this element xx cannot be in SS. Thus, there is an element in LL that is not in SS. Deduction [Y] is valid.
The intersection of Loops and Paradoxes creates a specific subgroup of Loops. Because no Paradox is a Sequence, this subgroup of Loops cannot be Sequences.
4
Evaluate Deduction [Z]: 'Some sequences are loops.'
We know SS and PP are disjoint, and PP intersects with LL. However, no information restricts the relationship between SS and LL. They could be completely disjoint or they could intersect. Deduction [Z] is invalid.
An unstated relationship cannot be assumed true in categorical syllogisms.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating categorical syllogisms using set theory and mutually exclusive properties.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 449Soru

A multi-generational family consists of eight members: K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, and R. Review the following relational conditions to determine their family tree:

• The family contains exactly two married couples.
• K is the paternal grandfather of R.
• P is the mother of Q and has exactly one sibling, N, who is male.
• O is the brother of M and the son of L.
• M is the unmarried aunt of Q.
• Q is the only sister of R.
• L has exactly two children.

Based on these conditions, match the individuals on the left with their correct relationship to R on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Individual: N
Individual: L
Individual: M
Individual: Q

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

N matches to Maternal Uncle, L matches to Paternal Grandmother, M matches to Paternal Aunt, and Q matches to Sister.
Based on the family tree deduction, the relationships accurately reflect the generation and maternal/paternal lineage defined in the conditions. N is the mother's brother (Maternal Uncle), L is the father's mother (Paternal Grandmother), M is the father's sister (Paternal Aunt), and Q is directly stated to be the sister.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify R's parents by connecting the grandfather and mother clues.
K is the paternal grandfather, meaning K's son is R's father. P is the mother of Q and R (since Q and R are siblings). Therefore, P is married to K's son.
Establishing the core nuclear family helps lock in generation 2.
2
Determine the identity of R's father and paternal grandmother.
L is the mother of O. Since K is the paternal grandfather and L has two children, K and L are the married grandparents (Generation 1). O must be their son, making O the father of R.
This connects the paternal side of the family tree to R.
3
Map the siblings of R's parents.
M is O's sister (aunt of Q and R), making her the paternal aunt. N is P's brother, making him the maternal uncle.
Clarifies the extended family relationships on both the mother's and father's sides.
4
Confirm generation 3 relationships.
Q is explicitly stated to be the sister of R.
Finalizes the matching pairs based on the complete family tree.

Anahtar Kavram

Blood Relations Family Tree Deduction
Soru 450Soru

The State Heritage Council (SHC) evaluates contractor applications for the 'Monument Revival Protocol'. As of August 2026, to qualify for a standard contract, an applicant must satisfy the following primary criteria:

(1) Have a minimum of 10 years of experience in masonry restoration.
(2) Have exactly zero safety violations recorded in the past 5 years.
(3) Employ a minimum of 40 certified heritage artisans.
(4) Provide a Financial Clearance Certificate (FCC) from the Central Reserve.

Exception Conditions:
- If an applicant satisfies all conditions EXCEPT (1), but has received a 'National Heritage Award', their file is to be Referred to the SHC Director.
- If an applicant satisfies all conditions EXCEPT (3), but utilizes approved 3D-printing masonry technology, they are to be classified under the Innovative Methods Category.
- If an applicant satisfies all conditions EXCEPT (4), but submits a sovereign guarantor letter from a municipal authority, they are to be Waitlisted for Q4 Allocation.

Administrative Note: If an applicant triggers multiple exception clauses, all corresponding administrative actions and classifications are applied concurrently. An applicant is only rejected if they fail a condition without meeting its specific exception clause, or if they fail condition (2).

Candidate Profile: 'Vanguard Antiquities Co.' has been operating in masonry restoration for 14 years. Their safety record has been spotless since 2018. They currently have 25 certified heritage artisans on payroll, but they actively utilize SHC-approved 3D-printing masonry technology. They were unable to obtain the FCC from the Central Reserve, but they included a sovereign guarantor letter from the Capital City Municipal Authority in their dossier. They have never received a National Heritage Award.

Based on the rules provided, which of the following administrative decisions must be applied to Vanguard Antiquities Co.? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Classify the applicant under the Innovative Methods Category; Waitlist the applicant for Q4 Allocation

Cevap

The correct actions are to classify the applicant under the Innovative Methods Category and to waitlist the applicant for Q4 Allocation.
Vanguard Antiquities Co. fulfills primary criteria (1) and (2) but fails criteria (3) and (4). However, the applicant meets the specific exception conditions for both failed criteria by utilizing 3D-printing technology and submitting a municipal guarantor letter. According to the administrative note, multiple exception statuses are applied concurrently. Therefore, the applicant must receive both the classification under the Innovative Methods Category and the Waitlisted status.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate the applicant against the four primary criteria.
Passes (1) with 14 years. Passes (2) with no violations since 2018 (8 years). Fails (3) with only 25 artisans. Fails (4) by lacking the FCC.
Establishing the baseline eligibility determines which exceptions, if any, need to be checked.
2
Assess the applicability of exception conditions for the failed criteria.
For failing (3), the applicant qualifies for the 'Innovative Methods Category' because they use approved 3D-printing technology. For failing (4), they qualify to be 'Waitlisted for Q4 Allocation' by having a municipal guarantor letter.
Failing primary criteria does not result in immediate rejection if specific exception clauses are satisfied.
3
Check the administrative rules regarding multiple exceptions.
The rules state that multiple exception clauses are applied concurrently, meaning both alternative statuses are granted rather than the application being rejected.
Administrative rules often dictate how compounding factors or overlapping exceptions must be handled legally and procedurally.

Anahtar Kavram

Analytical Decision Making and Criteria Selection
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 451Soru

Eight corporate trainers—M, N, O, P and S, T, U, V—are seated in two parallel rows containing four people each, such that there is an equal distance between adjacent persons. In Row 1, M, N, O, and P are seated and all of them are facing South. In Row 2, S, T, U, and V are seated and all of them are facing North. Therefore, in the given seating arrangement, each member seated in a row faces another member of the other row.

The following information is given:
1. S sits second to the left of U.
2. The person facing U sits to the immediate right of M.
3. O sits exactly opposite the person who sits to the immediate right of S.
4. N sits to the left of P.
5. T does not face M.

Who sits to the immediate left of the person who faces O?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: S

Cevap

The correct answer is S, because T faces O, and S sits to the immediate left of T.
The complete arrangement from West to East is P-O-N-M (Row 1, facing South) and S-T-U-V (Row 2, facing North). O is at the second position from the West. The person facing O is T. T is facing North, so the person to T's immediate left is S.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the positions of S, U, and M based on clues 1 and 2.
S is placed at the extreme left (Position 1) and U at Position 3 in Row 2. M is placed at the extreme left (Position 4) in Row 1.
Since S is second to the left of U, they must occupy positions (1, 3) or (2, 4) in the North-facing row. The person facing U is to the immediate right of M. In the South-facing Row 1, 'right' corresponds to a lower position number (West). This means M must be at Position 4 to have someone to their immediate right at Position 3. This confirms U is at Position 3 and S is at Position 1.
2
Place O in Row 1 based on clue 3.
O is placed at Position 2 in Row 1.
S is at Position 1. The immediate right of S (facing North) is Position 2. The person sitting exactly opposite this position is in Row 1 at Position 2. Thus, O sits here.
3
Place N, P, T, and V to complete the arrangement.
P is at Position 1, N is at Position 3, T is at Position 2, and V is at Position 4.
In Row 1, the empty spots are 1 and 3. N sits to the left of P. For South-facing people, left is Eastward (higher number), so P=1 and N=3. In Row 2, T does not face M (Position 4), so T must be at Position 2, leaving V at Position 4.
4
Answer the final question.
S is the final answer.
O is at Position 2. The person facing O is T. Since T is facing North, the person to the immediate left of T is S (Position 1).

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel row seating arrangement requiring relative directional orientation (Left/Right) for North and South facing individuals.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 452Soru

Based on the statements provided below, evaluate the logical validity of Conclusion I and Conclusion II.

Statement 1: The national medical council's regulatory framework dictates that artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic tools shall be used solely as secondary evaluation mechanisms and must not be the singular basis for prescribing invasive medical procedures.
Statement 2: Several elite healthcare facilities have recently deployed 'Cardio-AI', a state-of-the-art diagnostic system, into their cardiology departments to assess patient risk.

Conclusion I: 'Cardio-AI' cannot be the only mechanism used by these healthcare facilities to approve open-heart surgery for their patients.
Conclusion II: The national medical council has concluded that AI diagnostic tools are fundamentally unreliable and pose a severe threat to patients.

Which of the given options represents the correct logical deduction?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Only I follows

Cevap

Only I follows
The correct answer accurately validates only the first conclusion. Conclusion I is a direct logical inference because open-heart surgery is inherently an 'invasive medical procedure', and the first statement explicitly restricts AI tools from being the sole basis for prescribing such procedures. Conclusion II is invalid because it makes an extreme, unwarranted assumption that goes far beyond the text; regulating a tool as a secondary mechanism does not logically imply the council views it as fundamentally unreliable or dangerous.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Statement 1 to establish the regulatory constraint on AI tools.
AI tools cannot be the sole basis for prescribing invasive medical procedures.
To understand the exact limitation placed on the use of AI in these healthcare settings.
2
Analyze Statement 2 and apply the constraint to Conclusion I.
Since open-heart surgery is clearly an invasive medical procedure, Cardio-AI cannot be the singular basis for its approval. Thus, Conclusion I is logically valid.
To determine if Conclusion I is a direct logical deduction from combining the given premises.
3
Evaluate Conclusion II against the provided text.
The text restricts AI to 'secondary evaluation mechanisms', but it does not state or imply that AI is 'fundamentally unreliable' or a 'severe threat'. Conclusion II is invalid.
To check if Conclusion II is supported by the facts or if it is an unwarranted, extreme exaggeration.

Anahtar Kavram

Statement and Conclusions or Inferences
Soru 453Soru

Analyze the given logical statements and determine which of the conclusions can be definitively deduced.

Statements:
1. All chronitons are temporal particles.
2. No temporal particles are stable entities.
3. Some stable entities are observable phenomena.

Conclusions:
I. No chronitons are stable entities.
II. Some chronitons are temporal particles.
III. Some observable phenomena are not temporal particles.
IV. All temporal particles are chronitons.

Based on the rules of formal logic, which of the following is correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Only conclusions I and III follow

Cevap

Only conclusions I and III follow
Conclusion I logically follows because if all chronitons are part of temporal particles, and no temporal particles are stable entities, then no chronitons can be stable entities. Conclusion III follows because the stable entities that are observable phenomena cannot be temporal particles, meaning some observable phenomena are not temporal particles. Conclusions II and IV represent formal logical fallacies.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Conclusion I (No chronitons are stable entities)
Valid
Statement 1 places all chronitons inside temporal particles. Statement 2 separates temporal particles completely from stable entities. Therefore, chronitons are completely separated from stable entities.
2
Evaluate Conclusion II (Some chronitons are temporal particles)
Invalid
Statement 1 (All C are T) is a universal statement. In formal logic, universal statements do not imply existence. Deducing a particular conclusion (Some C are T) without a premise establishing the existence of chronitons is an existential fallacy.
3
Evaluate Conclusion III (Some observable phenomena are not temporal particles)
Valid
Statement 3 establishes an intersection between stable entities and observable phenomena. Since Statement 2 states no stable entities are temporal particles, the observable phenomena inside this intersection cannot be temporal particles.
4
Evaluate Conclusion IV (All temporal particles are chronitons)
Invalid
This is the fallacy of illicit conversion. The premise 'All chronitons are temporal particles' does not logically imply the reverse.

Anahtar Kavram

Syllogistic Deductions, Existential Fallacy, and Invalid Conversions
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 454Soru

A photographer is arranging a family for a portrait and asks a woman named Maya about her relationship to a boy named Leo. Maya replies, "His paternal grandfather is the father of my only brother." Based on this statement, what is Maya's relationship to Leo?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Paternal aunt; Aunt; paternal aunt; aunt

Cevap

Paternal aunt
Maya states that Leo's paternal grandfather is the father of her only brother. The father of Maya's brother is Maya's own father. This means Leo's paternal grandfather is Maya's father. Therefore, Leo's father must be the son of Maya's father. Since Maya has only one brother, that brother is Leo's father. Because Maya is a woman and the sister of Leo's father, she is Leo's paternal aunt.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the relationship described as 'the father of my only brother'.
The father of Maya's only brother is Maya's own father.
Siblings share the same father.
2
Equate Leo's paternal grandfather to Maya's father.
Leo's paternal grandfather is Maya's father.
Maya stated that Leo's paternal grandfather is the father of her only brother.
3
Determine who Leo's father is in relation to Maya.
Leo's father must be Maya's only brother.
Since Leo's paternal grandfather is Maya's father, Leo's father must be a son of Maya's father. Maya has only one brother, so he must be Leo's father.
4
Determine Maya's relationship to Leo.
Maya is Leo's paternal aunt.
Maya is explicitly introduced as a woman, making her the sister of Leo's father.

Anahtar Kavram

Tracing generational linkages through descriptive statements.
Soru 455Soru

The State Renewable Energy Commission evaluates applications for the 'Solar Micro-Grid Subsidy'. As of August 2026, an applicant cooperative must:
(1) be registered for at least 3 years.
(2) propose a solar plant capacity of at least 50 kW.
(3) contribute at least 20% of the project cost upfront.
(4) have no history of defaulting on state loans.

Exceptions:
(I) If an applicant fulfills all criteria EXCEPT (1), but proposes a capacity of 100 kW or more, the application is referred to the Director.
(II) If an applicant fulfills all criteria EXCEPT (3), but is located in a 'Notified Tribal District', the application is referred to the Welfare Board.

Match the following applicant cooperatives to their correct administrative decision based on the information provided.

Candidate Profiles:
- Horizon Co-op: Registered in January 2021; proposes a 75 kW plant; contributes 25% upfront; no default history.
- Apex Energy: Registered in January 2025; proposes a 125 kW plant; contributes 20% upfront; no default history.
- Green Ridge: Registered in January 2018; proposes a 60 kW plant; contributes 10% upfront; located in a Notified Tribal District; no default history.
- Sunrise Power: Registered in January 2015; proposes a 40 kW plant; contributes 25% upfront; no default history.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Horizon Co-op
Apex Energy
Green Ridge
Sunrise Power

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Horizon Co-op -> Approve Subsidy; Apex Energy -> Refer to Director; Green Ridge -> Refer to Welfare Board; Sunrise Power -> Reject Application
By systematically applying the rules, each candidate matches a single distinct outcome based on whether they meet all criteria, trigger a specific exception, or fail a criterion without exception coverage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Horizon Co-op against all criteria.
Meets all criteria.
Registered in 2021 (>3 years as of 2026), 75 kW (>=50), 25% upfront (>=20%), no defaults. No exceptions needed.
2
Evaluate Apex Energy against all criteria and exceptions.
Fails criterion 1, but triggers Exception I.
Registered in 2025 (only 1.5 years ago, failing the 3-year rule). However, the proposed capacity is 125 kW (>=100 kW), which requires a referral to the Director.
3
Evaluate Green Ridge against all criteria and exceptions.
Fails criterion 3, but triggers Exception II.
Contributes 10% (fails the >=20% rule). However, they are located in a Notified Tribal District, which routes the application to the Welfare Board.
4
Evaluate Sunrise Power against all criteria and exceptions.
Fails criterion 2, with no applicable exception.
Proposes a 40 kW capacity (fails the >=50 kW rule). Since there is no exception clause for failing the capacity requirement, the application must be rejected.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying complex administrative rules with nested exceptions to distinct case profiles to determine precise outcomes.
Soru 456Soru

Six friends—Kael, Lyla, Mateo, Nova, Orion, and Piper—are seated in a straight line. Some of them are facing North, while others are facing South.

Read the following information carefully:
1. Piper sits at one of the extreme ends of the line and faces South.
2. Orion sits second to the right of Piper.
3. Only two people sit between Orion and Kael.
4. The person sitting at the extreme left end of the line faces North.
5. Nova sits to the immediate right of Orion.
6. Mateo sits to the immediate left of Lyla.
7. Lyla is an immediate neighbor of Kael.
8. The immediate neighbors of Mateo face opposite directions.
9. Mateo faces the same direction as Piper, while Nova faces the same direction as Kael.

Based on the seating arrangement, match the individuals in List I with their correct descriptions in List II.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Kael
Mateo
Orion
Nova

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Kael matches with 'Sits at an extreme end and faces North.'; Mateo matches with 'Faces South and sits exactly between Lyla and Orion.'; Orion matches with 'Faces North and sits second to the left of Lyla.'; Nova matches with 'Faces North and sits to the immediate right of Piper.'
Based on a step-by-step logical deduction, the complete linear arrangement from left (Position 1) to right (Position 6) is: Kael (North), Lyla (South), Mateo (South), Orion (North), Nova (North), and Piper (South). This layout perfectly satisfies all directional conditions, allowing us to accurately match each person to their spatial description.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine Piper and Orion's positions.
Piper is at Position 6 (extreme right) and Orion is at Position 4.
Piper sits at an extreme end facing South. If she were at the left end (Position 1), her 'right' would be off the line. Thus, she must be at Position 6. Second to her right (towards the west) is Position 4, where Orion sits.
2
Determine Kael's position.
Kael is at Position 1.
There are two people between Orion (Position 4) and Kael. The only valid position is 4 - 3 = 1.
3
Determine Lyla and Mateo's positions, and Lyla's facing direction.
Lyla is at Position 2 facing South, and Mateo is at Position 3.
Lyla is Kael's neighbor, so she must be at Position 2. Mateo is to her immediate left. Position 1 is taken, so Mateo must be at Position 3. For Position 3 to be on Lyla's left, Lyla must face South (so her left points east).
4
Determine Nova's position and Orion's facing direction.
Nova is at Position 5, and Orion faces North.
Nova is to the immediate right of Orion (Position 4). The only adjacent empty seat is Position 5. For Position 5 to be on Orion's right, Orion must face North (so his right points east).
5
Deduce remaining facing directions.
Kael faces North, Mateo faces South, and Nova faces North.
The person at the extreme left (Kael) faces North. Mateo faces the same direction as Piper (South). Nova faces the same direction as Kael (North). The clue about Mateo's neighbors (Lyla facing South, Orion facing North) is consistent, as they face opposite directions.

Anahtar Kavram

Linear seating arrangement with bidirectional facing (North and South), requiring strict orientation-based left/right spatial deductions.
Soru 457Soru

Six friends—Alan, Brian, Clara, David, Elena, and Fiona���are sitting around a regular hexagonal table, with one person at each corner. All of them are facing the center of the table. Their seating arrangement is determined by the following clues:

- Alan sits second to the left of Clara.
- Elena sits exactly opposite to Brian.
- David sits to the immediate right of Elena.

Based on this information, match each person to the description of their correct seating position.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Fiona
Brian
David
Clara

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Fiona matches with 'Sits exactly opposite to Alan'; Brian matches with 'Sits to the immediate left of Clara'; David matches with 'Sits second to the right of Fiona'; and Clara matches with 'Sits to the immediate right of Brian'.
The correct pairings are derived from the single, unique seating arrangement dictated by the clues: Clara (1), Brian (2), Alan (3), David (4), Elena (5), and Fiona (6) in a clockwise order. This directly aligns each individual with their corresponding relative description.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Establish a numbering system and place the first two individuals.
Assume Clara sits at position 1. Alan sits at position 3.
Numbering the six corners clockwise from 1 to 6 helps track positions. Since everyone faces the center, 'left' means moving clockwise. Alan sits second to the left of Clara, so moving two steps clockwise from position 1 places Alan at position 3.
2
Identify the possible positions for the opposite pair, Elena and Brian.
Elena and Brian must occupy positions 2 and 5.
In a regular hexagon, the opposite pairs are (1,4), (2,5), and (3,6). Since positions 1 and 3 are already occupied by Clara and Alan, the only fully empty opposite pair is 2 and 5.
3
Determine the exact positions of Elena, Brian, and David.
Elena is at position 5, Brian is at position 2, and David is at position 4.
David sits to the immediate right of Elena. Facing the center, 'right' means moving counter-clockwise. If Elena were at position 2, her immediate right would be position 1, which Clara already occupies. Therefore, Elena must be at position 5. Her immediate right is position 4, where David sits. Consequently, Brian takes position 2.
4
Place the final person and finalize the pairings.
Fiona sits at position 6. The complete clockwise arrangement is: Clara (1), Brian (2), Alan (3), David (4), Elena (5), Fiona (6).
Fiona takes the last remaining seat. Matching these fixed positions to the provided descriptions yields the correct unique pairs.

Anahtar Kavram

Circular/Polygonal seating arrangement with inward-facing orientation, requiring the deduction of absolute positions using relative placement and opposite pairs.
Soru 458Soru

Eight diplomats—H, I, J, K, L, M, N, and O—are seated around a square table for a summit. Four of them sit at the four corners of the table facing the center, while the other four sit in the middle of each of the four sides facing outward (away from the center).

The seating arrangement satisfies the following conditions:
- L sits at a corner.
- H sits third to the right of L.
- M sits second to the left of H.
- N is an immediate neighbor of both H and M.
- J sits opposite to K, who is an immediate neighbor of M.
- I sits to the immediate left of L.

Based on the given information, who sits third to the right of N?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: I

Cevap

I
Based on the arrangement, N is seated at a corner and faces the center. For a person facing the center, 'right' corresponds to the counter-clockwise direction. Moving three positions counter-clockwise from N takes us past M and K, landing exactly on I.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define the directional rules based on facing orientation.
Corners face IN (Left = Clockwise, Right = Counter-Clockwise). Sides face OUT (Left = Counter-Clockwise, Right = Clockwise).
Crucial for accurately placing individuals according to relative position clues.
2
Place L and deduce H's position.
Let L sit at the Top-Left corner (facing IN). H is 3rd to the right (CCW), placing H in the middle of the Bottom side (facing OUT).
Anchoring the arrangement with the most definite starting clue.
3
Determine M and N's positions.
M is 2nd to the left of H. Since H faces OUT, left is CCW, placing M at the Right side. N is between H and M, so N is at the Bottom-Right corner (facing IN).
Following the chain of interconnected clues.
4
Place K and J.
K is an immediate neighbor of M. The only available spot next to M is the Top-Right corner, so K is there. J is opposite K, placing J at the Bottom-Left corner.
Satisfying the opposite condition and neighbor constraint.
5
Place I and O.
I is to the immediate left of L. L faces IN, so left is CW, placing I at the Top side. The remaining person O takes the last spot at the Left side.
Completing the seating arrangement.
6
Identify the person third to the right of N.
N is at the Bottom-Right corner (facing IN). Right is CCW. 1st is M, 2nd is K, 3rd is I.
Answering the specific question asked in the stem.

Anahtar Kavram

Positional reasoning with mixed facing directions around a closed geometric shape.
Soru 459Soru

Six colleagues—Hayes, Iyer, Jones, Klein, Lopez, and Miller—are seated around a circular table. Exactly three of them are facing the center, while the other three are facing outside.

Read the following conditions carefully:
1. Lopez faces outside and sits third to the right of Iyer.
2. Jones is an immediate neighbor of Iyer.
3. Hayes sits to the immediate right of Jones, and both face the center.
4. Miller sits second to the right of Hayes.
5. The immediate neighbors of Miller face opposite directions (one faces the center, while the other faces outside).

Based on the given information, what is the seating position of Hayes with respect to Miller?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Second to the right

Cevap

Hayes sits second to the right of Miller.
Based on the logical deductions, Miller sits at position 6 and faces outside. Hayes sits at position 2. For a person facing away from the center of the table, their right side corresponds to the clockwise direction. Moving clockwise from Miller (6) by two seats lands exactly on Hayes (2), meaning Hayes is second to the right.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Place Lopez and Iyer on the circular layout.
Let Lopez be at position 1, facing outside. Since Lopez sits third to the right of Iyer, they must sit exactly opposite each other (position 4).
In a 6-person circle, anyone sitting third to the right or left of another person sits directly opposite them.
2
Determine the positions of Jones and Hayes.
Jones is at position 3 and Hayes is at position 2. Both face the center.
Jones is adjacent to Iyer (4), so Jones must be at 3 or 5. Hayes sits to the immediate right of Jones. For a person facing the center, 'right' is counter-clockwise. If Jones were at 5, Hayes would be at 4, but Iyer is already there. Thus, Jones must be at 3, making Hayes's position 2.
3
Determine the positions of Miller and Klein.
Miller is at position 6 and Klein is at position 5.
Miller sits second to the right of Hayes. Since Hayes (2) faces the center, his right is counter-clockwise. Moving two seats counter-clockwise from 2 leads to 6 (past 1). Klein takes the last remaining seat at 5.
4
Deduce the facing direction of all remaining colleagues.
Klein faces the center. Iyer and Miller face outside.
Miller (6) has neighbors Lopez (1) and Klein (5). Since Lopez faces outside, and Miller's neighbors face opposite directions, Klein must face the center. We now have three people facing the center (Hayes, Jones, Klein). The remaining three (Lopez, Iyer, Miller) must therefore face outside.
5
Find the position of Hayes relative to Miller.
Hayes sits second to the right of Miller.
Miller is at position 6 and faces outside. For someone facing outside, their 'right' side is the clockwise direction. Counting clockwise from Miller (6), the first person is Lopez (1) and the second is Hayes (2).

Anahtar Kavram

Circular Seating Arrangement with Mixed Orientations
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 460Soru

Five committee members—Finn, Gina, Harry, Isla, and Jack—are seated in a single row of five adjacent chairs facing an auditorium stage.

1. Gina sits exactly in the middle chair.
2. Isla sits immediately to the right of Harry.
3. Finn sits somewhere to the left of Gina.
4. Jack does not sit adjacent to Gina.

Based on these conditions, arrange the committee members in the correct seating sequence from the leftmost chair to the rightmost chair.

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct sequence from left to right is: Jack, Finn, Gina, Harry, Isla.
By placing Gina in the middle, and determining that Harry and Isla must take the rightmost adjacent seats to leave room for Finn on the left, the remaining seats are filled by placing Jack away from Gina. This yields the single valid sequence of Jack, Finn, Gina, Harry, Isla.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Place Gina in the arrangement.
Gina occupies Seat 3.
The first condition explicitly states that Gina sits exactly in the middle chair of the five available seats.
2
Determine the available positions for Harry and Isla.
Harry occupies Seat 4 and Isla occupies Seat 5.
Isla sits immediately to the right of Harry, meaning they require two adjacent seats. The available pairs are Seats 1 & 2 or Seats 4 & 5. Because Finn must sit somewhere to the left of Gina (who is in Seat 3), Finn must occupy either Seat 1 or Seat 2. This leaves only Seats 4 & 5 for Harry and Isla.
3
Place Jack and Finn in the remaining seats.
Jack occupies Seat 1 and Finn occupies Seat 2.
Jack and Finn must take the remaining Seats 1 and 2. The fourth condition states that Jack does not sit adjacent to Gina, which means Jack cannot be in Seat 2. Therefore, Jack must be in Seat 1, leaving Finn to sit in Seat 2.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive reasoning using relative positional constraints and elimination in a linear arrangement.
ÖncekiSayfa 23 / 25Sonraki
Logical Reasoning and Analytical Ability Alıştırma Soruları — State PSC Exam — Sayfa 23 | Examkin