Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaDiagnostic and Screening Test Performance

A 32-year-old man comes to an outpatient community clinic in early autumn complaining of fever, cough, and myalgias. Epidemiological surveillance estimates that the prevalence of influenza A among symptomatic patients in this community is currently 20%20\%. The physician decides to use a new rapid point-of-care antigen test for influenza A. During its initial validation study at a tertiary care center during peak flu season (prevalence of 50%50\%), the test demonstrated a sensitivity of 80%80\% and a specificity of 90%90\%. Assuming the test's sensitivity and specificity remain constant, if this patient's test yields a positive result, which of the following best estimates the probability that he actually has influenza A?

  1. A
    16%16\%
  2. 67%67\%Cevap
  3. C
    80%80\%
  4. D
    89%89\%
  5. E
    95%95\%

Cevap

The probability that the patient actually has influenza A given a positive test is approximately 67%67\%.
The probability that the patient actually has influenza A given a positive test result is the positive predictive value (PPV). Predictive values depend heavily on the prevalence of the disease in the tested population. To calculate the new PPV, a 2×22 \times 2 contingency table can be constructed based on the community's prevalence of 20%20\%. In a hypothetical population of 100100 patients, 2020 will have influenza A and 8080 will not. With a sensitivity of 80%80\%, there will be 1616 true-positive results (0.80×200.80 \times 20). With a specificity of 90%90\%, there will be 7272 true-negative results (0.90×800.90 \times 80), leaving 88 false-positive results (80−7280 - 72). The total number of positive test results is the sum of true positives and false positives (16+8=2416 + 8 = 24). The PPV is the ratio of true positives to total positives: 16/24=2/316 / 24 = 2/3, which is approximately 67%67\%.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the current pre-test probability (prevalence) of influenza A.
The current prevalence in the community clinic is 20%20\%.
Predictive values are highly dependent on the prevalence of the disease in the specific population being tested, not the prevalence from the validation study.
2
Determine the number of patients with and without disease in a hypothetical population of 100.
2020 patients have the disease (Disease Positive) and 8080 patients do not (Disease Negative).
Using a hypothetical cohort of 100 makes calculating the components of the 2×22 \times 2 contingency table straightforward.
3
Calculate the expected number of true-positive and false-positive test results.
True Positives = 0.80×20=160.80 \times 20 = 16. False Positives = (1−0.90)×80=0.10×80=8(1 - 0.90) \times 80 = 0.10 \times 80 = 8.
Sensitivity (80%80\%) determines the proportion of diseased patients who test positive. Specificity (90%90\%) determines the proportion of healthy patients who test negative, leaving 10%10\% to incorrectly test positive.
4
Calculate the positive predictive value (PPV).
PPV = True Positives / (True Positives + False Positives) = 16/(16+8)=16/24=2/3≈67%16 / (16 + 8) = 16 / 24 = 2/3 \approx 67\%.
The question asks for the probability of having the disease given a positive test, which is the definition of PPV.

Anahtar Kavram

The positive predictive value (PPV) of a test changes dynamically with the prevalence of the disease in the tested population, even when intrinsic test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) remain constant.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Diagnostic and Screening Test Performance

Bu konudan daha fazla soru