A 68-year-old man is admitted to the progressive care unit for a severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On admission, he is awake, alert, and fully oriented. The attending physician informs the patient that his respiratory status is precarious and that he may soon require mechanical ventilation if standard medical therapy fails. The patient demonstrates full understanding of his clinical situation and explicitly states, "I know how bad my lungs are. If I stop breathing on my own, I do not want a breathing tube under any circumstances. Just keep me comfortable." The physician determines the patient has full decision-making capacity and thoroughly documents this conversation in the electronic medical record. Six hours later, the patient develops profound respiratory acidosis, becomes severely lethargic, and is entirely unresponsive to verbal and tactile stimuli. He currently lacks decision-making capacity. The patient's daughter, who is his legally appointed healthcare proxy, arrives at the hospital. She presents a formal, notarized advance directive completed by the patient 4 years ago. The document explicitly requests "all available life-sustaining treatments, including intubation and mechanical ventilation, to prolong my life." The daughter is distraught and demands that the medical team intubate her father immediately. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?
- AIntubate the patient because a notarized written document legally supersedes oral statements.
- BIntubate the patient as directed by the legally appointed healthcare proxy.
- CIntubate the patient temporarily pending an urgent hospital ethics committee review.
- Withhold intubation and administer therapies directed at symptom relief.Cevap
- EProceed with intubation based on the principle of beneficence in an emergency.