A 78-year-old man is admitted to the intensive care unit after suffering a massive ischemic stroke. On examination, he is unresponsive, requires mechanical ventilation, and lacks decision-making capacity. His prognosis for meaningful neurologic recovery is exceptionally poor. A review of his medical records reveals a legally valid advance directive that explicitly appoints his eldest daughter as his designated healthcare proxy. The daughter is informed of the prognosis and states that her father would not want to be kept alive on artificial life support in this condition. She requests that the team transition him to comfort care, including compassionate extubation. Shortly after, the patient's wife arrives at the hospital. She vehemently disagrees with the daughter's decision, insists that all life-sustaining measures be continued, and threatens legal action if care is withdrawn. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- Follow the direction of the eldest daughter and proceed with transitioning to comfort care.Cevap
- BTransfer decision-making authority to the patient's wife according to standard next-of-kin hierarchy.
- CMaintain life-sustaining therapy and consult the hospital ethics committee to mediate the dispute.
- DContinue current medical interventions until the daughter and wife reach a unanimous agreement.
- ESeek an emergency court injunction to determine the appropriate surrogate decision-maker.