A 35-year-old man presents to the outpatient psychiatric clinic for worsening irritability. During the session, he expresses intense anger towards his former business partner, stating, "He ruined my life. I bought a handgun yesterday, and I am going to shoot him at his house tonight." The patient then demands that the physician keep this information strictly confidential. Which of the following parties should the physician notify without the patient's explicit consent? (Select all that apply)
- The former business partnerCevap
- Local law enforcementCevap
- CThe patient's wife
- DThe patient's employer
- EThe patient's health insurance provider
Cevap
The physician must notify both the intended victim (the former business partner) and local law enforcement.
When a patient presents a specific, imminent threat of serious harm to an identifiable third party, the physician has a legal and ethical duty to protect the intended victim. This constitutes a direct exception to patient confidentiality. Disclosing the threat to both the intended victim and local law enforcement is the appropriate, legally sound, and required action to mitigate the danger.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Exceptions to Confidentiality: Duty to Warn and Protect (Tarasoff)