A 74-year-old woman presents to the emergency department reporting substernal chest pressure. Initial evaluation confirms a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. While waiting for an inpatient bed assignment, she experiences a 5-minute episode of third-degree atrioventricular block, which resolves spontaneously. The hospital's electronic health record is not integrated with the emergency department cardiac monitoring system, so this event is not automatically imported into the provider notes.
At change of shift, the emergency department physician provides a brief telephone report to the receiving inpatient night float resident. They do not use a standardized communication protocol, and the emergency physician forgets to mention the transient heart block. Unaware of this event, the night float resident assumes the patient has been hemodynamically stable and admits her to an unmonitored general medical ward bed.
Shortly after arrival on the floor, the patient receives a scheduled dose of oral metoprolol. An hour later, she suffers a severe bradycardic cardiac arrest requiring transcutaneous pacing and transfer to the intensive care unit. A root cause analysis is initiated to investigate this sentinel event.
Which of the following factors in this scenario represent latent system errors? (Select all that apply)
- The lack of interoperability between the emergency department cardiac monitors and the electronic health recordCevap
- The institutional culture permitting unstructured verbal transitions of care without a mandatory checklistCevap
- CThe emergency department physician's failure to verbally report the transient heart block
- DThe night float resident's decision to triage the patient to an unmonitored general medical ward bed
- EThe administration of oral metoprolol despite the recent episode of high-grade atrioventricular block