A 58-year-old man with hypertension and stage 3a chronic kidney disease brings a pharmaceutical advertisement to his primary care physician. The advertisement promotes a newly approved medication, "Renalox," highlighting that it "reduces the risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) by 44%!" The patient asks if this medication would be beneficial for him over the next several years.
The physician reviews the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial cited in the advertisement. In this trial, patients with similar baseline characteristics to this patient were randomized 1:1 to receive either Renalox or a placebo. Because participants were followed for variable durations, the study reported event incidence utilizing person-years of follow-up.
The trial results are summarized in the table below:
| Outcome | Placebo Arm (N = 2000) | Renalox Arm (N = 2000) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Follow-up | 8,000 person-years | 8,000 person-years |
| Progression to ESRD | 360 events | 200 events |
| All-Cause Mortality | 160 events | 120 events |
Assuming the incidence rate of ESRD remains constant over time, what is the number of patients who need to be treated with Renalox for exactly 5 years to prevent one additional case of progression to ESRD?
Cevap: 10 patients