Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorInterprofessional Teamwork and Conflict Resolution

A first-year internal medicine resident is covering the intensive care unit overnight. A 68-year-old patient receiving continuous norepinephrine therapy via a peripheral intravenous line develops severe blanching, coldness, and swelling at the infusion site. The resident contacts the covering critical care fellow, who instructs the resident to 'leave it alone and just observe for now,' citing that placing a new central line would disrupt their workflow. The resident firmly believes the peripheral line must be stopped immediately to prevent severe tissue necrosis.

According to standard interprofessional patient safety and conflict resolution protocols, arrange the following actions in the correct sequential order for escalating and managing this safety concern.

  1. 1Express the clinical observation regarding the blanching and recommend stopping the infusion to the fellow.
  2. 2State to the fellow, 'I am uncomfortable continuing this infusion as it is a direct patient safety issue.'
  3. 3Notify the on-call critical care attending physician about the unresolved disagreement and imminent risk.
  4. 4Document the interaction objectively in the medical record and file an institutional safety event report.

Cevap

The correct sequence follows standard escalation protocols: First, express the clinical observation to the fellow. Second, reassert the concern using standardized safety language. Third, escalate to the attending physician via the chain of command. Finally, after securing the patient, file a formal safety event report.
The correct sequence mirrors the TeamSTEPPS Two-Challenge Rule and standard escalation policies. A provider must first voice the clinical concern (Challenge 1). If ignored, they must voice it again using standardized safety language like 'uncomfortable' or 'safety issue' (Challenge 2). If the conflict persists and patient safety remains at risk, they must 'stop the line' and escalate via the chain of command to the attending physician. Incident reporting is an essential final step, but it is strictly retrospective and must only occur after the patient is safe.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Initiate the first challenge by presenting the clinical findings and recommendation to the fellow.
The fellow receives the initial voice of concern regarding the extravasation risk.
Standard protocols require addressing the primary decision-maker directly before utilizing stronger language or escalating.
2
Apply the Two-Challenge Rule using standardized terminology (e.g., CUS).
The fellow is given a second, unambiguous warning regarding patient safety.
If the initial concern is dismissed, a stronger, structured assertion is required to overcome hierarchical barriers.
3
Escalate the situation via the chain of command by contacting the attending physician.
The attending physician is notified to intervene and make a final clinical decision.
When the Two-Challenge Rule fails to resolve an imminent threat, chain of command activation is mandatory to protect the patient.
4
Complete administrative incident reporting.
The event is logged in the hospital's safety system for review.
System-level reporting is vital for quality improvement but must strictly occur only after the patient is clinically secured.

Anahtar Kavram

The Two-Challenge Rule and sequential chain-of-command escalation in patient safety.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Interprofessional Teamwork and Conflict Resolution

Bu konudan daha fazla soru