A 59-year-old man is hospitalized with a severe traumatic brain injury following a high-speed motorcycle collision. He is comatose, ventilator-dependent, and lacks decision-making capacity. The trauma team recommends an open reduction and internal fixation of a complex pelvic fracture to stabilize the pelvis and prevent long-term functional morbidity. The patient is divorced and has no written advance directives. His live-in girlfriend of five years arrives and presents a legally executed 'General Durable Power of Attorney for Financial Affairs' naming her as the principal agent. She insists the surgery be performed. Shortly after, the medical team contacts the patient's 35-year-old daughter, who lives in another state. The daughter states, 'My dad told me clearly last year that he would never want any major surgeries to keep him alive if his brain was severely and permanently damaged,' and she refuses consent for the procedure. Which of the following is the most appropriate action regarding the patient's care?
- AProceed with the surgery as requested by the girlfriend because her legal document grants medical decision-making authority.
- Withhold the surgery as directed by the daughter because she holds higher priority in the statutory surrogate hierarchy.Cevap
- CProceed with the surgery under the doctrine of implied consent to prevent long-term functional morbidity.
- DSchedule the surgery and consult the hospital ethics committee to transfer surrogate authority to the live-in girlfriend.
- EPostpone decision-making and require the daughter to obtain court-appointed legal guardianship to formalize her authority.