A 60-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic cancer is hospitalized for management of intractable abdominal pain and jaundice. He has a biliary stent placement scheduled for the next day. However, during morning rounds, the patient states that he no longer wants the procedure or any further medical interventions, including his current intravenous antibiotics for ascending cholangitis. He clearly expresses that he understands the risks of stopping treatment, including overwhelming sepsis and imminent death. He states, "I am exhausted and ready to let nature take its course." The patient's adult daughter, who is designated as his healthcare proxy in his advance directive, insists that the medical team proceed with the stent placement and antibiotics, arguing that the patient's pain medications are clouding his judgment. The patient is alert, oriented to person, place, time, and situation, and can clearly articulate the reasoning behind his decision. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AAdminister intravenous naloxone to rapidly reverse any potential opioid-induced cognitive impairment
- BPetition for a court order to determine the patient's legal competence to refuse care
- Honor the patient's refusal of treatment and initiate a transition to comfort careCevap
- DFollow the daughter's directives to proceed with interventions as she is the designated healthcare proxy
- EDiscontinue the opioid analgesics to reassess his decision-making capacity without medication effects