A 38-year-old man with a 10-year history of schizoaffective disorder is evaluated in the surgical ward for a rapidly spreading necrotizing soft tissue infection of his right lower extremity. Intravenous antibiotics have been initiated, but the surgical team determines that an urgent right above-knee amputation is required to prevent death from overwhelming sepsis. The physician discusses the procedure, risks, benefits, and the certainty of death without surgery. The patient refuses the amputation, stating, "I understand that if I don't have this leg cut off, the infection will spread to my blood and I will die in a few days. But my body is a temple, and I refuse to be mutilated. I would rather die intact." He calmly repeats the physician's explanations accurately and demonstrates clear understanding of his prognosis. His thought processes are linear, and he denies any current auditory or visual hallucinations commanding him to refuse. His sister, who is his emergency contact, arrives and demands that the surgery be performed, stating, "He has a severe mental illness; he's clearly not competent to make this choice. You have to save his life." Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- Document the patient's informed refusal and continue with antibiotics and supportive careCevap
- BObtain consent for the amputation from the patient's sister as the surrogate decision-maker
- CPetition the local court for an emergency order declaring the patient legally incompetent
- DPlace the patient on an involuntary psychiatric hold to facilitate the life-saving surgery
- EDischarge the patient from the hospital immediately against medical advice