Soru

Zorluk: ZorClassification of Medical Errors and Adverse Events

During a monthly morbidity and mortality conference, a healthcare organization's patient safety officer reviews several recent clinical incidents to identify systemic improvement opportunities. Match each incident summary to its most accurate error taxonomy classification.

  • A physician prescribes an excessively high dose of intravenous heparin. The clinical pharmacist identifies the anomaly during review, and the order is corrected before administration.Near miss (Close call)
  • A patient develops life-threatening anaphylaxis to a newly initiated biologic therapy despite appropriate indication, correct weight-based dosing, and strict adherence to administration protocols.Unpreventable adverse event
  • A nurse intends to administer intravenous famotidine but inadvertently picks up and administers a vial of similarly packaged fosphenytoin from the medication drawer.Active execution error (Slip)
  • A patient receives the wrong blood product because a recent hospital software update introduced a hidden glitch that misaligns patient identification numbers on printed transfusion labels.Latent system vulnerability

Cevap

The intercepted heparin order is a near miss; the anaphylaxis to correctly dosed biologic therapy is an unpreventable adverse event; the inadvertent administration of the wrong medication due to packaging is an active execution error; and the software glitch causing misaligned labels is a latent system vulnerability.
Each incident correctly aligns with established patient safety taxonomy. A near miss is an intercepted error. An unpreventable adverse event occurs despite appropriate care. A slip is a sharp-end execution failure, and a latent vulnerability is a blunt-end system defect.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first incident involving the heparin order.
The error was caught by a pharmacist before administration.
Determining if an error reached the patient distinguishes a near miss from a preventable adverse event.
2
Analyze the second incident involving anaphylaxis.
The medication was correctly indicated, dosed, and administered.
Distinguishing between harm caused by an error (preventable adverse event) and harm occurring despite standard care (unpreventable adverse event) is essential.
3
Analyze the third incident involving famotidine and fosphenytoin.
The nurse had the right intention but performed the wrong action due to look-alike vials.
Classifying the type of human error requires separating intention (which was correct) from execution (which was flawed), defining a slip.
4
Analyze the fourth incident involving the software glitch.
A system-level defect created the condition that led to the wrong blood product being administered.
Identifying the root origin of the error (blunt end vs. sharp end) is required to classify it as a latent system vulnerability rather than purely an active clinician error.

Anahtar Kavram

Accurate classification of patient safety incidents requires distinguishing between active errors (sharp end), latent vulnerabilities (blunt end), near misses, and unpreventable adverse events.
Bu soruyu puanla