A 54-year-old woman is admitted to the general medical ward for community-acquired pneumonia. On hospital day 2, she develops acute agitation, diaphoresis, and tachycardia (120/min). The cross-cover night physician receives a page from the nurse stating, "The patient in room 412 is getting restless and her heart rate is up." The physician quickly reviews the electronic health record, notes a prominent "Alcohol Use Disorder" entry in her past medical history, and immediately concludes the patient is in alcohol withdrawal. Without performing a bedside evaluation or reviewing the recent vital signs (which showed a new fever of 39.2°C and blood pressure of 85/50 mmHg), the physician orders high-dose intravenous lorazepam. Two hours later, the patient requires transfer to the intensive care unit for septic shock secondary to an expanding empyema.
During the subsequent morbidity and mortality conference, a root cause analysis is performed to identify the cognitive errors made and to propose durable, system-level human factors engineering solutions.
Which of the following statements correctly pair a cognitive error demonstrated in this case with an effective, strong system-level mitigation strategy? (Select the 2 correct answers)
- Anchoring bias; integrating a clinical decision support system that forces review of full vital signs before prescribing high-dose sedativesCevap
- Premature closure; standardizing a cross-cover handoff protocol that requires the primary team to document specific contingency plans for high-risk patientsCevap
- CAvailability heuristic; mandating that cross-cover physicians complete annual continuing medical education on the varied presentations of inpatient sepsis
- DConfirmation bias; instituting a hospital policy requiring bedside nurses to question the physician's diagnostic reasoning before administering psychotropic drugs
- EFraming effect; implementing a punitive peer-review tracking system for physicians who prescribe intravenous sedatives without a documented in-person assessment