A 75-year-old man is evaluated on the surgical ward for worsening wet gangrene of his right foot. He has a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, and mild-to-moderate vascular dementia. Intravenous antibiotics have been initiated, but a below-the-knee amputation is urgently recommended to prevent overwhelming sepsis. When the attending surgeon discusses the procedure, the patient is oriented to person and place, but states the current year is 1998. Despite this, he is able to clearly repeat back that his foot is severely infected, that the infection could spread to his blood and become fatal, and that the proposed surgery involves removing the lower part of his leg. He states, "I understand I will likely die without the operation, but I refuse to let you cut off my leg. I lived my whole life as an independent man, and I won't spend my final days helpless in a wheelchair or a nursing home." His daughter, who was appointed as his healthcare proxy (durable power of attorney for healthcare) two years ago after his dementia diagnosis, is present. She insists, "My father's memory is terrible, and he is legally incompetent. I am his proxy, and I give you permission to perform the surgery to save his life." Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- Honor the patient's refusal and continue medical management.Cevap
- BProceed with the amputation based on the daughter's authorization.
- CRequest a psychiatric consultation to formally determine the patient's legal competence.
- DProceed with the amputation under the principle of implied consent.
- EDiscontinue intravenous antibiotics and transfer the patient to an inpatient hospice facility.