An integrated health system initiates a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to assess a novel electronic health record (EHR) alert designed to prevent acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving nephrotoxic medications. The investigators calculate a required sample size of 4,500 patient encounters to achieve 90% statistical power () to detect a 25% relative reduction in AKI incidence, utilizing a two-tailed of 0.05. This calculation is based on historical data showing a baseline AKI incidence of 12% in this population.
Six months into the trial, a blinded interim analysis reveals that the overall pooled incidence of AKI across both the intervention and control arms is only 6%. Investigation reveals this is likely due to a hospital-wide intravenous hydration protocol implemented independently just before the trial began. The investigators determine that a 25% relative reduction in AKI remains the minimum clinically important difference they wish to detect.
If the investigators proceed without altering the planned sample size of 4,500 encounters, which of the following describes the most accurate statistical consequence of this unexpected drop in baseline incidence?
- The statistical power to detect the 25% relative reduction will decrease, increasing the probability of a Type II error.Cevap
- BThe hydration protocol will introduce confounding, requiring a stratified analysis to accurately estimate the treatment effect.
- CThe predictive value of a statistically significant finding will increase due to the lower overall prevalence of the outcome.
- DThe reduced event rate will necessitate the use of a non-parametric statistical test to compare the two groups.
- EThe minimum detectable relative effect size will decrease, allowing the trial to be sensitive to smaller clinical differences.