During morning rounds, the critical care team evaluates a patient with a history of Parkinson disease who is currently receiving high-flow oxygen for sepsis secondary to aspiration pneumonia. The patient, a 75-year-old male, has a tenuous respiratory status. The attending physician discusses the potential need for mechanical ventilation if clinical deterioration occurs.
The patient clearly states, "I do not want to be put on a breathing machine. If it is my time, let me go." When asked to explain his understanding of this choice, the patient correctly articulates that without mechanical ventilation, his infection will likely cause his death, and he accepts this outcome. He is alert and oriented to person and place, but he cannot recall the current year or the name of the hospital.
Shortly after this conversation, the patient's daughter arrives holding a valid, signed durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOA-HC). She angrily demands that her father be intubated if his condition worsens. She argues that his inability to recall the year proves he is legally incompetent to make life-and-death decisions.
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- ADefer to the daughter's directive as she is the legally designated healthcare proxy.
- BRequest a psychiatric consultation to officially determine the patient's legal competence.
- Honor the patient's refusal and enter a do-not-intubate order in the medical record.Cevap
- DConsult the hospital ethics committee to mediate the dispute between the patient and his daughter.
- ETransition the patient to an inpatient hospice unit immediately due to his refusal of escalated care.